ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2021
Transcriptional profiling of paediatric ependymomas identifies prognostically significant groups.
Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A predictive model for differentiating PFA and PFB subtypes of posterior fossa ependymoma using multi-sequence MRI radiomics: a two-center study.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- EZHIP boosts neuronal-like synaptic gene programs and depresses polyamine metabolism.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025Article
- Imaging features to distinguish posterior fossa ependymoma subgroups.European radiology · 2024Article
- Nuclear condensates of YAP fusion proteins alter transcription to drive ependymoma tumourigenesis.Nature cell biology · 2023Article
- Polish Multi-Institutional Study of Children with Ependymoma-Clinical Practice Outcomes in the Light of Prospective Trials.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Molecular Stratification of Childhood Ependymomas as a Basis for Personalized Diagnostics and Treatment.Cancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The majority of supratentorial ependymomas in children contain oncogenic fusions, such as ZFTA-RELA or YAP1-MAMLD1. In contrast, posterior fossa (PF) ependymomas lack recurrent somatic mutations and are classified based on gene expression or methylation profiling into group A (PFA) and group B (PFB). We have applied a novel method, NanoString nCounter Technology, to identify four molecular groups among 16 supratentorial and 50 PF paediatric ependymomas, using 4-5 group-specific signature genes. Clustering analysis of 16 supratentorial ependymomas revealed 9 tumours with a RELA fusion-positive signature (RELA+), 1 tumour with a YAP1 fusion-positive signature (YAP1+), and 6 not-classified tumours. Additionally, we identified one RELA+ tumour among historically diagnosed CNS primitive neuroectodermal tumour samples. Overall, 9 of 10 tumours with the RELA+ signature possessed the ZFTA-RELA fusion as detected by next-generation sequencing (p = 0.005). Similarly, the only tumour with a YAP1+ signature exhibited the YAP1-MAMLD1 fusion. Among the remaining unclassified ependymomas, which did not exhibit the ZFTA-RELA fusion, the ZFTA-MAML2 fusion was detected in one case. Notably, among nine ependymoma patients with the RELA+ signature, eight survived at least 5 years after diagnosis. Clustering analysis of PF tumours revealed 42 samples with PFA signatures and 7 samples with PFB signatures. Clinical characteristics of patients with PFA and PFB ependymomas corroborated the previous findings. In conclusion, we confirm here that the NanoString method is a useful single tool for the diagnosis of all four main molecular groups of ependymoma. The differences in reported survival rates warrant further clinical investigation of patients with the ZFTA-RELA fusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.