ArticleHuman brain mapping2021
A dual-channel language decoding from brain activity with progressive transfer training.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brain-imager: a multimodal framework for image reconstruction and captioning from human brain activity.Brain informatics · 2025Article
- Mind captioning: Evolving descriptive text of mental content from human brain activity.Science advances · 2025Article
- An attention-based fuzzy CNN-LTSM network for visual object recognition from fMRI images.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Improved image reconstruction from brain activity through automatic image captioning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A dual-channel language decoding from brain activity with progressive transfer training.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Boosting-GNN: Boosting Algorithm for Graph Networks on Imbalanced Node Classification.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When we view a scene, the visual cortex extracts and processes visual information in the scene through various kinds of neural activities. Previous studies have decoded the neural activity into single/multiple semantic category tags which can caption the scene to some extent. However, these tags are isolated words with no grammatical structure, insufficiently conveying what the scene contains. It is well-known that textual language (sentences/phrases) is superior to single word in disclosing the meaning of images as well as reflecting people's real understanding of the images. Here, based on artificial intelligence technologies, we attempted to build a dual-channel language decoding model (DC-LDM) to decode the neural activities evoked by images into language (phrases or short sentences). The DC-LDM consisted of five modules, namely, Image-Extractor, Image-Encoder, Nerve-Extractor, Nerve-Encoder, and Language-Decoder. In addition, we employed a strategy of progressive transfer to train the DC-LDM for improving the performance of language decoding. The results showed that the texts decoded by DC-LDM could describe natural image stimuli accurately and vividly. We adopted six indexes to quantitatively evaluate the difference between the decoded texts and the annotated texts of corresponding visual images, and found that Word2vec-Cosine similarity (WCS) was the best indicator to reflect the similarity between the decoded and the annotated texts. In addition, among different visual cortices, we found that the text decoded by the higher visual cortex was more consistent with the description of the natural image than the lower one. Our decoding model may provide enlightenment in language-based brain-computer interface explorations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.