ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2021
Improved outcomes with delayed admission to post-acute care: results of a natural experiment.
Article in European geriatric medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characteristics and care trajectories of older patients in temporary stays in Denmark.European geriatric medicine · 2025Article
- The Limitations of Post-Acute Care Schemes as a Quick Fix for Hospital Acquired Deconditioning.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the effectiveness of a post-acute care scheme by exploiting a natural experiment.
methodsWe used a reduction in funding for an Irish PAC scheme based in private nursing homes as a natural experiment to explore the effectiveness of this scheme in a single large general hospital.
resultsCompared with an equivalent 3-month period in 2017 (pre-change, N = 169), those admitted to PAC in 2019 (post-change, N = 179), spent a median 6 days longer in acute care, although total duration spent in healthcare settings was the same. Compared with 2017, readmissions to hospital within 90 days of discharge (43/179 (24.0% v 58/169 (34.3%), p = 0.03) and discharge to long-term care from the PAC facility (3 (1.7%) v 14 (8.3%), p = 0.004) were significantly lower in 2019.
conclusionOur results suggest that the longer stay in acute care and shorter stay in PAC was beneficial for patients and led to improved outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34313975What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.