SynthesisNeurosurgical review2022
Clinical features and treatment strategies for vertex epidural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis from individual participant data.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acute epidural vertex hematoma with good hemostasis using delayed surgery after monitoring of coagulation and fibrinolytic parameters: A case report.Surgical neurology international · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vertex epidural hematoma (VEDH) is a rare extradural hematoma and often misdiagnosed because of its variety of clinical symptoms and characteristic location. Determining optimal timing and technique for VEDH surgery is difficult because of its midline location and atypical clinical course. This study aims to understand the clinical manifestations and current treatment strategies for VEDH. We searched the published literature regarding VEDH through PubMed and Google Scholar, and individual patient data (IPD) were obtained from the eligible articles. A systematic review and IPD meta-analysis were conducted. In total, 70 patients' individual participant data were gathered. Most patients were male (87%), and traffic-related accidents were the most common injury mechanism (49%). Approximately half the patients (47%) were neurologically intact with nonspecific symptoms such as headache, dizziness, and vomiting at admission. Motor weakness alone (17%) and symptoms related to cranial nerve dysfunction such as anosmia, blurred vision, or diplopia (10%) were also noted. A surgical approach was initially chosen for 20 patients (28%), but eventually chosen for 20 more (total 40, 57%) during the observation period (average delay to surgery, 5 days). Patients who received surgery showed significantly poorer neurological status and larger hematoma size. Totally, two patients (3%) died, but most patients (94%) had a favorable outcome scoring 5 on the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Although VEDH generally showed favorable outcomes, clinicians must be aware of a high rate of delayed neurological deterioration during the observation period, which can be fatal due to central downward herniation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34313885What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.