Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34313863›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2021

Physician-patient communication affects patient satisfaction in treatment decision-making: a structural equation modelling analysis of a web-based survey in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Katsuyoshi Matsuoka, Hirono Ishikawa, Takeo Nakayama, Yusuke Honzawa, Atsuo Maemoto, Fumihito Hirai, Fumiaki Ueno, Noriko Sato, Yutaka Susuta, Toshifumi Hibi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Katsuyoshi MatsuokaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2950-7660
Hirono IshikawaTeikyo University Graduate School of Public Health, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1458-6957
Takeo NakayamaDepartment of Health Informatics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7918-6252
Yusuke HonzawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9601-4065
Atsuo MaemotoIBD Center, Sapporo Higashi Tokushukai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9182-8502
Fumihito HiraiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Medicine, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5493-5675
Fumiaki UenoCenter for Gastroenterology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Japan.
Noriko SatoIkuyaku. Integrated Value Development Division, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2660-0808
Yutaka SusutaIkuyaku. Integrated Value Development Division, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1621-9261
Toshifumi HibiCenter for Advanced IBD Research and Treatment, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Kitasato University, 5-9-1 Shirokane, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8642, Japan. thibi@insti.kitasato-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-6256-1204

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relationship of bidirectional sharing of information between physicians and patients to patient satisfaction with treatment decision-making for ulcerative colitis (UC) has not been examined. Here, we conducted a web-based survey to evaluate this relationship.

methodsPatients aged ≥ 20 years with UC were recruited from the IBD Patient Panel and Japanese IBD Patient Association. Patients completed our web-based survey between 11 May and 1 June 2020. The main outcomes were patient satisfaction (assessed by the Decision Regret Scale) and patient trust in physicians (assessed by the Trust in Physician Scale).

resultsIn this study (n = 457), a structural equation modelling analysis showed that physician-to-patient and patient-to-physician information significantly affected patient satisfaction with treatment decision-making (standardised path coefficient: 0.426 and 0.135, respectively) and patient trust in physicians (0.587 and 0.158, respectively). Notably, physician-to-patient information had a greater impact. For patient satisfaction with treatment decision-making and patient trust in physicians, information on "disease" (indirect effect: 0.342 and 0.471, respectively), "treatment" (0.335 and 0.461, respectively), and "endoscopy" (0.295 and 0.407, respectively) was particularly important, and the level of this information was adequate or almost adequate. Patient-to-physician information on "anxiety and distress" (0.116 and 0.136, respectively), "intention and desire for treatment" (0.113 and 0.132, respectively), and "future expectations of life" (0.104 and 0.121, respectively) were also important for patient satisfaction with treatment decision-making and patient trust in physicians, but these concerns were not adequately communicated.

conclusionsAdequate physician-patient communication, especially physician-to-patient information, enhanced patient satisfaction with treatment decision-making for UC.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultColitis, UlcerativeCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJapanLatent Class AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesPatient satisfactionPhysician–patient communicationUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID34313863
PMCPMC8370900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.