Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34313845›Full record

ArticleHistochemistry and cell biology2021

A rapid and robust method for the cryopreservation of human granulosa cells.

Sarah Beschta, Katja Eubler, Nancy Bohne, Ignasi Forne, Dieter Berg, Ulrike Berg, Artur Mayerhofer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. NAM journal · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. In focus in HCB.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah Beschta *Cell Biology, Anatomy III, Faculty of Medicine, Biomedical Center Munich (BMC), Ludwig-Maximilian-University (LMU), 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Katja Eubler *Cell Biology, Anatomy III, Faculty of Medicine, Biomedical Center Munich (BMC), Ludwig-Maximilian-University (LMU), 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Nancy BohneFertility Centre A.R.T. Bogenhausen, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Ignasi ForneProtein Analysis Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Biomedical Center Munich (BMC), Ludwig-Maximilian-University (LMU), 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Dieter BergFertility Centre A.R.T. Bogenhausen, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Ulrike BergFertility Centre A.R.T. Bogenhausen, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Artur MayerhoferCell Biology, Anatomy III, Faculty of Medicine, Biomedical Center Munich (BMC), Ludwig-Maximilian-University (LMU), 82152, Martinsried, Germany. Mayerhofer@bmc.med.lmu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9388-4639
München Klinik Bogenhausen · DECenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich · DELMU Klinikum · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 456828204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human primary granulosa cells (GCs) derived from women undergoing oocyte retrieval can be cultured and used as a cellular model for the study of human ovarian function. In vitro, they change rapidly, initially resembling cells of the preovulatory follicle and then cells of the corpus luteum. They are derived from individual patients, whose different medical history, lifestyle and age lead to heterogeneity. Thus, cells can rarely be ideally matched for cellular experiments or, if available, only in small quantities. We reasoned that cryopreservation of human GCs may be helpful to improve this situation. Previous studies indicated the feasibility of such an approach, but low survival of human GCs was reported, and effects on human GC functionality were only partially evaluated. We tested a slow freezing protocol (employing FCS and DMSO) for human GCs upon isolation from follicular fluid. We compared cryopreserved and subsequently thawed cells with fresh, non-cryopreserved cells from the same patients. About 80% of human GCs survived freezing/thawing. No differences were found in cell morphology, survival rate in culture, or transcript levels of mitochondrial (COX4, OPA1, TOMM20), steroidogenic (CYP11A1, CYP19A1) or cell-cell contact genes (GJA1) between the two groups in cells cultured for 1-5 days. A proteomic analysis revealed no statistically significant change in the abundance of a total of 5962 proteins. The two groups produced comparable basal levels of progesterone and responded similarly to hCG with elevation of progesterone. Taken together, our results show this to be a rapid and readily available method for the cryopreservation of human GCs. We anticipate that it will allow future large-scale experiments and may thereby improve cellular studies with human ovarian cells.

Indexed as

CryopreservationCells, CulturedFemaleGranulosa CellsHumansCell cultureCryopreservationIVFMass spectrometryOvarian cellsProgesterone

Identifiers

PMID34313845
PMCPMC8604824
OpenAlexW3186927481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.