Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34313724›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021

Feasibility and Repeatability of Handheld Optical Coherence Tomography in Children With Craniosynostosis.

Sohaib R Rufai, Richard Bowman, Catey Bunce, Vasiliki Panteli, Rebecca J McLean, Seema Teli, Irene Gottlob, Mervyn G Thomas, Noor Ul Owase Jeelani, Frank A Proudlock

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Sohaib R RufaiClinical and Academic Department of Ophthalmology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Richard BowmanClinical and Academic Department of Ophthalmology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Catey BunceClinical Trials Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Vasiliki PanteliClinical and Academic Department of Ophthalmology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Rebecca J McLeanThe University of Leicester Ulverscroft Eye Unit, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.
Seema TeliThe University of Leicester Ulverscroft Eye Unit, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.
Irene GottlobThe University of Leicester Ulverscroft Eye Unit, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.
Mervyn G ThomasThe University of Leicester Ulverscroft Eye Unit, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.
Noor Ul Owase JeelaniUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Frank A ProudlockThe University of Leicester Ulverscroft Eye Unit, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.
Ulverscroft (United Kingdom) · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GBLeicester Royal Infirmary · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J004189/1Medical Research Council MR/N004566/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether handheld optical coherence tomography (OCT) is feasible and repeatable in children with craniosynostosis. Methods: This was a prospective cross-sectional study. Children with syndromic and non-syndromic craniosynostosis 0 to 18 years of age were recruited between February 13, 2020, and October 1, 2020. Main outcome measures included feasibility (patient recruitment and handheld OCT success rates) and repeatability, which were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) where repeated images of the optic nerve head (ONH) within the same visit were available. ONH parameters used for repeatability analysis included cup depth, width, and area; disc width; rim height; retinal thickness; retinal nerve fiber layer thickness; and Bruch's membrane opening minimum rim width. Results: Fifty children were approached, and all 50 (100%) were successfully recruited. Median age was 51.1 months (range, 1.9-156.9; interquartile range, 37.0-74.2), and 33 of the children (66%) were male. At least one ONH image was obtained in 43 children (86%), and bilateral ONH imaging was successful in 38 children (76%). Factors boosting the likelihood of success included good understanding and cooperation of the child and parent/guardian and availability of an assistant. Repeatability analysis was performed in 20 children, demonstrating good repeatability (ICC range, 0.77-0.99; the majority exceeded 0.90). OCT correctly identified two cases of intracranial hypertension, one of which was undetected by prior fundoscopy. Conclusions: Handheld OCT is feasible and repeatable in children with syndromic and non-syndromic forms of craniosynostosis. Translational Relevance: Our handheld OCT approach could be used for the clinical surveillance of children with craniosynostosis.

Indexed as

CraniosynostosesTomography, Optical CoherenceChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesHumansMaleNerve FibersProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRetinal Ganglion Cells

Identifiers

PMID34313724
PMCPMC8322722
OpenAlexW3184079691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.