Trial reportJAMA2021
Effect of 7 vs 14 Days of Antibiotic Therapy on Resolution of Symptoms Among Afebrile Men With Urinary Tract Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01994538 (Seven Versus Fourteen Day Treatment for Male Urinary Tract Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Seven Versus Fourteen Day Treatment for Male Urinary Tract Infection
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effects of information technology interventions for optimizing antibiotic prescribing in urinary tract infections: a systematic review.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Patient and Family Representation in Randomized Clinical Trials Published in 3 Medical and Surgical Journals: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2022Pooled it
- Real-World Effectiveness of Intravenous and Oral Antibiotic Stepdown Strategies for Gram-Negative Complicated Urinary Tract Infection With Bacteremia.Open forum infectious diseases · 2024Trial
- Comparison of three doses of amikacin on alternate days with a daily dose of meropenem during the same period for the treatment of urinary tract infection with E. coli: a double-blind clinical trial.BMC research notes · 2024Trial
- Epidemiology of Acute Cystitis or Afebrile Urinary Tract Infection in Adult Men: A Systematic Literature Review.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Review
- Safety of Fluoroquinolones and Cotrimoxazole in Urinary Tract Infections in Older Males.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Comparative effectiveness of oral antibiotics to treat uncomplicated urinary tract infections in male outpatients.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Article
- Emergency medicine physicians treating urine cultures when it is not clear they should.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Correlation of broad-spectrum antibiotic utilization patterns with invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients and development of an early prediction model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimal antibiotic use in the intensive care unit.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- Antibiotic Therapy Duration for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections: An Evidence-Based Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Urinary tract infection in adults: gaps in current guidelines - opinions from an international multidisciplinary panel and relevance to clinical practice.BMC proceedings · 2025Article
- Evaluation of shorter versus longer antifungal treatment durations forAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Antibiotic De-Escalation in the Intensive Care Unit: Rationale and Potential Strategies.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Improving effective antimicrobial resistance (AMR) prevention in ambulatory care: lessons from secondary appraisal of Belgian anti-infectious treatment care guidelines.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025Article
- A comparison of empiric therapy with cefazolin versus ceftriaxone for patients with complicated urinary tract infections in a tertiary care veterans affairs medical center.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Effect of Inadequate Treatment in Adult Patients with Community-Acquired Acute Pyelonephritis Due to Enterobacterales Under Empirical Management with Cefazolin.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Antibiotic duration for common bacterial infections-a systematic review.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025Review
- Evaluation of antibiotic prescribing for the treatment of male community-acquired urinary tract infections using reimbursement data.PloS one · 2025Article
- Utility of urine culture in men with uncomplicated cystitis in ambulatory settings.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Determination of optimal treatment durations for common infectious diseases is an important strategy to preserve antibiotic effectiveness. Objective: To determine whether 7 days of treatment is noninferior to 14 days when using ciprofloxacin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole to treat urinary tract infection (UTI) in afebrile men. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled noninferiority trial of afebrile men with presumed symptomatic UTI treated with ciprofloxacin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole at 2 US Veterans Affairs medical centers (enrollment, April 2014 through December 2019; final follow-up, January 28, 2020). Of 1058 eligible men, 272 were randomized. Interventions: Participants continued the antibiotic prescribed by their treating clinician for 7 days of treatment and were randomized to receive continued antibiotic therapy (n = 136) or placebo (n = 136) for days 8 to 14 of treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The prespecified primary outcome was resolution of UTI symptoms by 14 days after completion of active antibiotic treatment. A noninferiority margin of 10% was selected. The as-treated population (participants who took ≥26 of 28 doses and missed no more than 2 consecutive doses) was used for the primary analysis, and a secondary analysis included all patients as randomized, regardless of treatment adherence. Secondary outcomes included recurrence of UTI symptoms and/or adverse events within 28 days of stopping study medication. Results: Among 272 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 69 [62-73] years) who were randomized, 100% completed the trial and 254 (93.4%) were included in the primary as-treated analysis. Symptom resolution occurred in 122/131 (93.1%) participants in the 7-day group vs 111/123 (90.2%) in the 14-day group (difference, 2.9% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -5.2% to ∞]), meeting the noninferiority criterion. In the secondary as-randomized analysis, symptom resolution occurred in 125/136 (91.9%) participants in the 7-day group vs 123/136 (90.4%) in the 14-day group (difference, 1.5% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -5.8% to ∞]) Recurrence of UTI symptoms occurred in 13/131 (9.9%) participants in the 7-day group vs 15/123 (12.9%) in the 14-day group (difference, -3.0% [95% CI, -10.8% to 6.2%]; P = .70). Adverse events occurred in 28/136 (20.6%) participants in the 7-day group vs 33/136 (24.3%) in the 14-day group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among afebrile men with suspected UTI, treatment with ciprofloxacin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for 7 days was noninferior to 14 days of treatment with regard to resolution of UTI symptoms by 14 days after antibiotic therapy. The findings support the use of a 7-day course of ciprofloxacin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole as an alternative to a 14-day course for treatment of afebrile men with UTI. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01994538.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.