ArticleJMIR human factors2021
User Evaluation of the Swedish Patient Accessible Electronic Health Record: System Usability Scale.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness and therapeutic compliance of digital therapy in shoulder rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Trial
- Comparative Usability Evaluation of Two Hospital Information Systems: A Mixed-Methods Study in an Iranian Teaching Hospital.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the usability of the spinal cord stimulator recharging procedure in the treatment of neuropathic pain. A quantitative and qualitative study.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Patients' Usability Experience With a Postoperative Follow-Up Web Application.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
- Design and evaluation patient portal for patients with HTLV-1.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Assessing the acceptability and usability of MedSafer, a patient-centered electronic deprescribing tool.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- Article
- Applying a co-designed medication plan for safer medication treatment in older persons: a feasibility study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2025Article
- Harmonizing patient-centric requirements for secure digital health services in heterogeneous settings.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Swedish Version of the System Usability Scale: Translation, Adaption, and Psychometric Evaluation.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Guideline adherence in depression outcome measurement: a retrospective cohort study from Swedish psychiatric outpatient care.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Development, Content Validity and Usability of a Self-Assessment Instrument for the Lifestyle of Breast Cancer Survivors in Brazil.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Use of the FallAkte Plus System as an IT Infrastructure for the North Rhine-Westphalian General Practice Research Network: Mixed Methods Usability Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Usability and Evaluation of a Health Information System in the Emergency Department: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
- Article
- Utilization of patient portals: a cross-sectional study investigating associations with mobile app quality.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Co-design of an Augmented Reality Asthma Inhaler Educational Intervention for Children: Development and Usability Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2023Article
- Performance and usability evaluation of a mobile health data capture application in clinical cancer trials follow-up.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2022Article
- Obtaining patients' medical history using a digital device prior to consultation in primary care: study protocol for a usability and validity study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Usability of the Swedish Accessible Electronic Health Record: Qualitative Survey Study.JMIR human factors · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransparency is increasingly called for in health care, especially, when it comes to patients' access to their electronic health records. In Sweden, the e-service Journalen is a national patient accessible electronic health record (PAEHR), accessible online via the national patient portal. User characteristics and perceived benefits of using a PAEHR influence behavioral intention for use and adoption, but poor usability that increases the effort expectancy can have a negative impact. It is, therefore, of interest to explore how users of the PAEHR Journalen perceive its usability and usefulness.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to explore how the users of the Swedish PAEHR experience the usability of the system and to identify differences in these experiences based on the level of transparency of the region.
methodsA survey study was conducted to elicit opinions and experiences of patients using Journalen. The data were collected from June to October 2016. The questionnaire included questions regarding the usability of the system from the System Usability Scale (SUS). The SUS analysis was the focus of this paper. Analysis was performed on different levels: nationally looking at the whole data set and breaking it down by focusing on 2 different regions to explore differences in experienced usability based on the level of transparency.
resultsDuring the survey period, 423,141 users logged into Journalen, of which 2587 unique users completed the survey (response rate 0.61%). The total mean score for all respondents to the SUS items was 79.81 (SD 14.25), which corresponds to a system with good usability. To further explore whether the level of transparency in a region would affect the user's experience of the usability of the system, we analyzed the 2 regions with the most respondents: Region Uppsala (the first to launch, with a high level of transparency), and Region Skåne (an early implementer, with a low level of transparency at the time of the survey). Of the participants who responded to at least 1 SUS statement, 520 stated that they had received care in Region Skåne, whereas 331 participants had received care in Region Uppsala. Uppsala's mean SUS score was 80.71 (SD 13.41), compared with Skåne's mean of 79.37 (SD 13.78).
conclusionsThe Swedish national PAEHR Journalen has a reasonably good usability (mean SUS score 79.81, SD 14.25); however, further research into more specific usability areas are needed to ensure usefulness and ease of use in the future. A somewhat higher SUS score for the region with high transparency compared with the region with low transparency could indicate a relationship between the perceived usability of a PAEHR and the level of transparency offered, but further research on the relationship between transparency and usability is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.