Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34313595›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2021

A Brief Intervention to Increase Uptake and Adherence of an Internet-Based Program for Depression and Anxiety (Enhancing Engagement With Psychosocial Interventions): Randomized Controlled Trial.

Philip J Batterham, Alison L Calear, Matthew Sunderland, Frances Kay-Lambkin, Louise M Farrer, Helen Christensen, Amelia Gulliver

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Philip J BatterhamCentre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4547-6876
Alison L CalearCentre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7028-725X
Matthew SunderlandThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8452-364X
Frances Kay-LambkinPriority Research Centre for Brain and Mental Health, University of Newcastle., Newcastle, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4252-5572
Louise M FarrerCentre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5694-4631
Helen ChristensenBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0435-2065
Amelia GulliverCentre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6351-9844
Australian National University · AUBlack Dog Institute · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychosocial, self-guided, internet-based programs are effective in treating depression and anxiety. However, the community uptake of these programs is poor. Recent approaches to increasing engagement (defined as both uptake and adherence) in internet-based programs include brief engagement facilitation interventions (EFIs). However, these programs require evaluation to assess their efficacy.

objectiveThe aims of this hybrid implementation effectiveness trial are to examine the effects of a brief internet-based EFI presented before an internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy self-help program (myCompass 2) in improving engagement (uptake and adherence) with that program (primary aim), assess the relative efficacy of the myCompass 2 program, and determine whether greater engagement was associated with improved efficacy (greater reduction in depression or anxiety symptoms) relative to the control (secondary aim).

methodsA 3-arm randomized controlled trial (N=849; recruited via social media) assessed the independent efficacy of the EFI and myCompass 2. The myCompass 2 program was delivered with or without the EFI; both conditions were compared with an attention control condition. The EFI comprised brief (5 minutes), tailored audio-visual content on a series of click-through linear webpages.

resultsUptake was high in all groups; 82.8% (703/849) of participants clicked through the intervention following the pretest survey. However, the difference in uptake between the EFI + myCompass 2 condition (234/280, 83.6%) and the myCompass 2 alone condition (222/285, 77.9%) was not significant (n=565; χ

conclusionsThis brief internet-based EFI did not increase the uptake of or adherence to an existing internet-based program for depression and anxiety. Individuals' motivation to initiate and complete internet-based self-guided interventions is complex and remains a significant challenge for self-guided interventions.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12618001565235; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=375839.

Indexed as

DepressionInternet-Based InterventionAnxietyAnxiety DisordersAustraliaCrisis InterventionHumansInternetPsychosocial Interventionadherenceengagement-facilitation interventionimplementationinternetmental healthrandomized controlled trialuptake

Identifiers

PMID34313595
PMCPMC8367139
OpenAlexW3171521959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.