Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34313532›Full record

ReviewmAbs

Discovery-stage identification of drug-like antibodies using emerging experimental and computational methods.

Emily K Makowski, Lina Wu, Priyanka Gupta, Peter M Tessier

Abstract readReviewVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Review in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Joined at the hip: The role of light chain complementarity determining region 2 in antibody self-association.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily K MakowskiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9709-9873
Lina WuBiointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Priyanka GuptaDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6483-3069
Peter M TessierDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3220-007X

Funding

Cellular Biotechnology Training Program (CBTP)T32GM008353 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SCHWENDEMAN, ANNA · 1991 to 2021
$9.3M
Cellular Biotechnology Training Program (CBTP) - Years 31-35T32GM145304 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Guizhi Zhu · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
Design and Evolution of Polyvalent Domain Antibodies Specific for Tau AggregatesRF1AG059723 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KANE, RAVI S., TESSIER, PETER M · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
Mechanisms transducing insulin and insulin resistance in the hippocampusR01AG050598 · NIA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI MCNAY, EWAN C · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
Structure-guided antibody targeting of pre-selected epitopes in amyloidogenic aggregatesR35GM136300 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TESSIER, PETER M · 2020 to 2024
$1.5M
Design of Antibody Fragments Specific For Amyloidogenic AggregatesR01GM104130 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TESSIER, PETER M · 2014 to 2018
$1.3M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG050598NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG059723NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104130NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136300NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008353NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is intense and widespread interest in developing monoclonal antibodies as therapeutic agents to treat diverse human disorders. During early-stage antibody discovery, hundreds to thousands of lead candidates are identified, and those that lack optimal physical and chemical properties must be deselected as early as possible to avoid problems later in drug development. It is particularly challenging to characterize such properties for large numbers of candidates with the low antibody quantities, concentrations, and purities that are available at the discovery stage, and to predict concentrated antibody properties (e.g., solubility, viscosity) required for efficient formulation, delivery, and efficacy. Here we review key recent advances in developing and implementing high-throughput methods for identifying antibodies with desirable

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDrug DevelopmentModels, MolecularAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalHumansAntibodies, Monoclonalaffinityaggregationcomputational modelingdesigndevelopabilityhigh throughputhumanizationimmunogenicitymAbmonoclonal antibodypharmacokineticspolyspecificitypredictionsolubilityspecificitytherapeuticviscosity

Identifiers

PMID34313532
PMCPMC8346245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.