Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34313531›Full record

ReviewGut microbes

Studies of xenobiotic-induced gut microbiota dysbiosis: from correlation to mechanisms.

Liang Chi, Pengcheng Tu, Hongyu Ru, Kun Lu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut microbes. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Early supplementation with live combinedFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Progress on the mechanism of intestinal microbiota against colorectal cancer.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. iMeta · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liang ChiDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Pengcheng TuDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Hongyu RuDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Kun LuDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
The UNC Chapel Hill Superfund Research Program (UNC-SRP)P42ES031007 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Rebecca Fry · 2020 to 2026
$22.2M
Functional interaction between the gut microbiome and arsenic exposureR01ES024950 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LU, KUN · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
The gut microbiome and glyphosate neurotoxicityR03ES032067 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LU, KUN · 2020 to 2021
$147k
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES031007NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES024950NIEHS NIH HHS R03 ES032067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental chemicals can alter gut microbial community composition, known as dysbiosis. However, the gut microbiota is a highly dynamic system and its functions are still largely underexplored. Likewise, it is unclear whether xenobiotic exposure affects host health through impairing host-microbiota interactions. Answers to this question not only can lead to a more precise understanding of the toxic effects of xenobiotics but also can provide new targets for the development of new therapeutic strategies. Here, we aim to identify the major challenges in the field of microbiota-exposure research and highlight the need to exam the health effects of xenobiotic-induced gut microbiota dysbiosis in host bodies. Although the changes of gut microbiota frequently co-occur with the xenobiotic exposure, the causal relationship of xenobiotic-induced microbiota dysbiosis and diseases is rarely established. The high dynamics of the gut microbiota and the complex interactions among exposure, microbiota, and host, are the major challenges to decipher the specific health effects of microbiota dysbiosis. The next stage of study needs to combine various technologies to precisely assess the xenobiotic-induced gut microbiota perturbation and the subsequent health effects in host bodies. The exposure, gut microbiota dysbiosis, and disease outcomes have to be causally linked. Many microbiota-host interactions are established by previous studies, including signaling metabolites and response pathways in the host, which may use as start points for future research to examine the mechanistic interactions of exposure, gut microbiota, and host health. In conclusion, to precisely understand the toxicity of xenobiotics and develop microbiota-based therapies, the causal and mechanistic links of exposure and microbiota dysbiosis have to be established in the next stage study.

Indexed as

AnimalsDysbiosisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHost Microbial InteractionsHumansXenobioticsXenobioticsdysbiosisGut microbiotahost–microbiota interactionsxenobiotics

Identifiers

PMID34313531
PMCPMC8346244
OpenAlexW3183683622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.