Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34313457›Full record

ArticlemSystems2021

A CRISPR Interference Screen of Essential Genes Reveals that Proteasome Regulation Dictates Acetic Acid Tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Vaskar Mukherjee, Ulrika Lind, Robert P St Onge, Anders Blomberg, Yvonne Nygård

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. TuningJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Recent Advances in Directed Yeast Genome Evolution.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vaskar MukherjeeDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Division of Industrial Biotechnology, Chalmers University of Technologygrid.5371.0, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ulrika LindDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburggrid.8761.8, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Robert P St OngeStanford Genome Technology Center, Stanford Universitygrid.168010.e, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Anders BlombergDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburggrid.8761.8, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Yvonne NygårdDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Division of Industrial Biotechnology, Chalmers University of Technologygrid.5371.0, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Chalmers University of Technology · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SEPalo Alto University · US

Funding

Chalmers Area of Advance EnergyNovo Nordisk Fonden (NNF) NF19OC0057685Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (KVA)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) is a powerful tool to study cellular physiology under different growth conditions, and this technology provides a means for screening changed expression of essential genes. In this study, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae CRISPRi library was screened for growth in medium supplemented with acetic acid. Acetic acid is a growth inhibitor challenging the use of yeast for the industrial conversion of lignocellulosic biomasses. Tolerance to acetic acid that is released during biomass hydrolysis is crucial for cell factories to be used in biorefineries. The CRISPRi library screened consists of >9,000 strains, where >98% of all essential and respiratory growth-essential genes were targeted with multiple guide RNAs (gRNAs). The screen was performed using the high-throughput, high-resolution Scan-o-matic platform, where each strain is analyzed separately. Our study identified that CRISPRi targeting of genes involved in vesicle formation or organelle transport processes led to severe growth inhibition during acetic acid stress, emphasizing the importance of these intracellular membrane structures in maintaining cell vitality. In contrast, strains in which genes encoding subunits of the 19S regulatory particle of the 26S proteasome were downregulated had increased tolerance to acetic acid, which we hypothesize is due to ATP salvage through an increased abundance of the 20S core particle that performs ATP-independent protein degradation. This is the first study where high-resolution CRISPRi library screening paves the way to understanding and bioengineering the robustness of yeast against acetic acid stress.

Indexed as

acetic acid toleranceCRISPR interferenceessential geneshigh-throughput screeningoxidative stressphenomicsproteasometranscriptional regulationyeast

Identifiers

PMID34313457
PMCPMC8407339
OpenAlexW3141894193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.