Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34313298›Full record

ReviewEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2021

ESC working group on cardiac cellular electrophysiology position paper: relevance, opportunities, and limitations of experimental models for cardiac electrophysiology research.

Katja E Odening, Ana-Maria Gomez, Dobromir Dobrev, Larissa Fabritz, Frank R Heinzel, Matteo E Mangoni, Cristina E Molina, Leonardo Sacconi, Godfrey Smith, Milan Stengl and 4 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Ca2+ signalling in cardiac muscle: the importance of balances.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Mechano-electrical feedback in transgenic rabbit models of long QT syndrome Type 2 and short QT syndrome Type 1.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Gene therapy for cardiac arrhythmias.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. hiPSC-CM electrophysiology: impact of temporal changes and study parameters on experimental reproducibility.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024
    Article
  18. Lessons on the non-linear path of medical progress and biological complexity from mouse models of the Brugada syndrome.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. High-throughput methods for cardiac cellular electrophysiology studies: the road to personalized medicine.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Katja E OdeningTranslational Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6999-841X
Ana-Maria GomezSignaling and cardiovascular pathophysiology-UMR-S 1180, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, 92296 Châtenay-Malabry, France.
Dobromir DobrevInstitute of Pharmacology, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Larissa FabritzInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9241-1733
Frank R HeinzelDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Matteo E MangoniInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France.
Cristina E MolinaInstitute of Experimental Cardiovascular Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Leonardo SacconiNational Institute of Optics and European Laboratory for Non Linear Spectroscopy, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9320-5085
Godfrey SmithInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK.
Milan StenglDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Dierk ThomasDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Center for Heart Rhythm Disorders (HCR), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Antonio ZazaDepartment of Biotechnology and Bioscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9355-4958
Carol Ann RemmeDepartment of Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jordi HeijmanDepartment of Cardiology, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1418-108X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac arrhythmias are a major cause of death and disability. A large number of experimental cell and animal models have been developed to study arrhythmogenic diseases. These models have provided important insights into the underlying arrhythmia mechanisms and translational options for their therapeutic management. This position paper from the ESC Working Group on Cardiac Cellular Electrophysiology provides an overview of (i) currently available in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo electrophysiological research methodologies, (ii) the most commonly used experimental (cellular and animal) models for cardiac arrhythmias including relevant species differences, (iii) the use of human cardiac tissue, induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived and in silico models to study cardiac arrhythmias, and (iv) the availability, relevance, limitations, and opportunities of these cellular and animal models to recapitulate specific acquired and inherited arrhythmogenic diseases, including atrial fibrillation, heart failure, cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, sinus node, and conduction disorders and channelopathies. By promoting a better understanding of these models and their limitations, this position paper aims to improve the quality of basic research in cardiac electrophysiology, with the ultimate goal to facilitate the clinical translation and application of basic electrophysiological research findings on arrhythmia mechanisms and therapies.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationElectrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacAnimalsCardiac ElectrophysiologyElectrophysiological PhenomenaHumansModels, TheoreticalAnimal modelsArrhythmiasAtrial fibrillationCardiac electrophysiologyCellular electrophysiologyExperimental modelsIon channelsMechanismsPosition paper

Identifiers

PMID34313298
PMCPMC11636574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.