Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34312986›Full record

ArticleStress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress2022

Building resilience for healthcare professionals working in an Italian red zone during the COVID-19 outbreak: A pilot study.

Francesca Giordano, Alessandra Cipolla, Michael Ungar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Establishing a Comprehensive Hierarchical construct of Eustress (CHE).Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Managing Children's Fears during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Strategies Adopted by Italian Caregivers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesca GiordanoDepartment of Psychology, Resilience Research Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Largo Gemelli, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2959-2850
Alessandra CipollaDepartment of Psychology, Resilience Research Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Largo Gemelli, Milan, Italy.
Michael UngarCanada Research Chair in Child, Family and Community Resilience, Resilience Research Centre Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITDalhousie University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has placed considerable strain on healthcare workers showing high rates of stress and psychological health problems. Interventions are urgently needed to help healthcare workers perform under conditions of great risk and uncertainty. In particular, healthcare leadership is known to be critical to supporting healthcare workers to deal with an uncertain and distressing healthcare environment. This pilot study evaluated the impact of the R2 resilience program tailored for healthcare leaders working in a highly affected COVID-19 area in Italy. Through two group cohorts, 21 healthcare leaders completed the intervention, with 17 participants providing pre- and post-intervention assessment data. Sixty-two staff members who benefitted from their coordinators' resilience-focused leadership were also included in the study. Findings show that participation in R2 was associated with reduction in levels of perceived stress and burnout symptoms, and increases in rugged qualities, self-efficacy and in social-ecological resilience. Significant changes in rugged qualities, self-efficacy and perceived stress were also detected in staff members. High rates of participants' program satisfaction have been detected. R2 is a promising intervention for healthcare professionals working in emergency settings designed to enhance the rugged qualities and resources required to deal with heightened exposure to stress.

Indexed as

COVID-19Resilience, PsychologicalDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansPandemicsPilot ProjectsCOVID-19healthcare workersinterventionpandemicR2 resilience programresilience

Identifiers

PMID34312986
PMCPMC9292917
OpenAlexW3185083143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.