Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34312817›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2022

E-consensus on telemedicine in colorectal surgery: a RAND/UCLA-modified study.

Gaetano Gallo, Arcangelo Picciariello, Gian Luca Di Tanna, Giulio Aniello Santoro, Roberto Perinotti, Telemedicine in Colorectal Surgery Italian Working Group, Ugo Grossi

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Gaetano GalloDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy. gallog@unicz.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1066-4671
Arcangelo PicciarielloDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Gian Luca Di TannaFaculty of Medicine, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Newtown, NSW, Australia.
Giulio Aniello SantoroIV Surgery Unit, Treviso Regional Hospital, DISCOG, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Roberto PerinottiDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Surgical Unit, Infermi Hospital, Biella, Italy.
Telemedicine in Colorectal Surgery Italian Working Group
Ugo GrossiIV Surgery Unit, Treviso Regional Hospital, DISCOG, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
University of Padua · ITIstituto Tumori Bari · ITOspedale degli Infermi · ITUNSW Sydney · AUMagna Graecia University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is revolutionizing healthcare delivery. The aim of the study was to reach consensus among experts on the possible applications of telemedicine in colorectal surgery. A group of 48 clinical practice recommendations (CPRs) was developed by a clinical guidance group based on coalescence of evidence and expert opinion. The Telemedicine in Colorectal Surgery Italian Working Group included 54 colorectal surgeons affiliated to the Italian Society of Colo-Rectal Surgery (SICCR) who were involved in the evaluation of the appropriateness of each CPR, based on published RAND/UCLA methodology, in two rounds. Stakeholders' median age was 44.5 (IQR 36-60) years, and 44 (81%) were males. Agreement was obtained on the applicability of telemonitoring and telemedicine for multidisciplinary pre-operative evaluation. The panel voted against the use of telemedicine for a first consultation. 15/48 statements deemed uncertain on round 1 and were re-elaborated and assessed by 51/54 (94%) panelists on round 2. Consensus was achieved in all but one statement concerning the cost of a teleconsultation. There was strong agreement on the usefulness of teleconsultation during follow-up of patients with diverticular disease after an in-person visit. This e-consensus provides the boundaries of telemedicine in colorectal surgery in Italy. Standardization of infrastructures and costs remains to be better elucidated.

Indexed as

Colorectal SurgeryCOVID-19TelemedicineAdultHumansMaleSARS-CoV-2ColorectalCOVID-19RAND/UCLATeleconsultationTelehealthTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34312817
PMCPMC8312353
OpenAlexW3186000165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.