ReviewAesthetic plastic surgery2022
Progress of 3D Printing Techniques for Nasal Cartilage Regeneration.
Review in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reinforced biotubes as readily available and regenerative vascular grafts.Nature communications · 2026Article
- 3D Printing in Nasal Reconstruction: Application-Based Evidence on What Works, When, and Why.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Nasal Rehabilitation in a Patient After Basal Cell Carcinoma and Radiotherapy: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Human Septal Cartilage Tissue Engineering: Current Methodologies and Future Directions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Advances in 3D printing for the repair of tympanic membrane perforation: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Nanotechnology development in surgical applications: recent trends and developments.European journal of medical research · 2023Review
- The Creation of an Average 3D Model of the Human Cartilaginous Nasal Septum and Its Biomimetic Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Usefulness of T2-Weighted Images with Deep-Learning-Based Reconstruction in Nasal Cartilage.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Review
- Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing Strategies for Irregularly Shaped Cartilage Tissue Engineering: Current State and Challenges.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Once cartilage is damaged, its self-repair capacity is very limited. The strategy of tissue engineering has brought a new idea for repairing cartilage defect and cartilage regeneration. In particular, nasal cartilage regeneration is a challenge because of the steady increase in nasal reconstruction after oncologic resection, trauma, or rhinoplasty. From this perspective, three-dimensional (3D) printing has emerged as a promising technology to address the complexity of nasal cartilage regeneration, using patient's image data and computer-aided deposition of cells and biomaterials to precisely fabricate complex, personalized tissue-engineered constructs. In this review, we summarized the major progress of three prevalent 3D printing approaches, including inkjet-based printing, extrusion-based printing and laser-assisted printing. Examples are highlighted to illustrate 3D printing for nasal cartilage regeneration, with special focus on the selection of seeded cell, scaffolds and growth factors. The purpose of this paper is to systematically review recent research about the challenges and progress and look forward to the future of 3D printing techniques for nasal cartilage regeneration.Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
34312695What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.