Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34312531›Full record

ArticleNature microbiology2021

Host preference and invasiveness of commensal bacteria in the Lotus and Arabidopsis root microbiota.

Kathrin Wippel, Ke Tao, Yulong Niu, Rafal Zgadzaj, Niklas Kiel, Rui Guan, Eik Dahms, Pengfan Zhang, Dorthe B Jensen, Elke Logemann and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Root colonization by beneficial rhizobacteria.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Enhanced Endophytic Colonization of Flavobacterium Promotes Plant Resistance to Fusarium Wilt.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Artificial soil (ArtSoil): Recreating soil conditions in synthetic plant growth media.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Factors affecting the genetic diversity ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kathrin Wippel *Department of Plant-Microbe Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5901-3381
Ke Tao *Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Yulong NiuDepartment of Plant-Microbe Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Rafal ZgadzajDepartment of Plant-Microbe Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Niklas KielCluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Rui GuanDepartment of Plant-Microbe Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0862-2368
Eik DahmsDepartment of Plant-Microbe Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7452-1146
Pengfan ZhangDepartment of Plant-Microbe Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Dorthe B JensenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Elke LogemannDepartment of Plant-Microbe Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Simona RadutoiuDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. radutoiu@mbg.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8841-1415
Paul Schulze-LefertDepartment of Plant-Microbe Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany. schlef@mpipz.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8978-1717
Ruben Garrido-OterDepartment of Plant-Microbe Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany. garridoo@mpipz.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1769-892X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Roots of different plant species are colonized by bacterial communities, that are distinct even when hosts share the same habitat. It remains unclear to what extent the host actively selects these communities and whether commensals are adapted to a specific plant species. To address this question, we assembled a sequence-indexed bacterial culture collection from roots and nodules of Lotus japonicus that contains representatives of most species previously identified using metagenomics. We analysed taxonomically paired synthetic communities from L. japonicus and Arabidopsis thaliana in a multi-species gnotobiotic system and detected signatures of host preference among commensal bacteria in a community context, but not in mono-associations. Sequential inoculation experiments revealed priority effects during root microbiota assembly, where established communities are resilient to invasion by latecomers, and that host preference of commensal bacteria confers a competitive advantage in their cognate host. Our findings show that host preference in commensal bacteria from diverse taxonomic groups is associated with their invasiveness into standing root-associated communities.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSymbiosisArabidopsisBacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaLotusPlant RootsSoil Microbiology

Identifiers

PMID34312531
PMCPMC8387241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.