Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34312455›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Improving prediction of COVID-19 evolution by fusing epidemiological and mobility data.

Santi García-Cremades, Juan Morales-García, Rocío Hernández-Sanjaime, Raquel Martínez-España, Andrés Bueno-Crespo, Enrique Hernández-Orallo, José J López-Espín, José M Cecilia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Effectiveness of Mobility Restrictions on Controlling the Spread of COVID-19 in a Resistant Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Santi García-CremadesCenter of Operations Research, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche (UMH), 03202, Elche, Spain.
Juan Morales-GarcíaComputer Science Department, Universidad Católica de Murcia (UCAM), 30107, Murcia, Spain.
Rocío Hernández-SanjaimeCenter of Operations Research, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche (UMH), 03202, Elche, Spain.
Raquel Martínez-EspañaComputer Science Department, Universidad Católica de Murcia (UCAM), 30107, Murcia, Spain.
Andrés Bueno-CrespoComputer Science Department, Universidad Católica de Murcia (UCAM), 30107, Murcia, Spain.
Enrique Hernández-OralloComputer Engineering Department, Univesitat Politècnica de València (UPV), 46022, Valencia, Spain.
José J López-EspínCenter of Operations Research, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche (UMH), 03202, Elche, Spain.
José M CeciliaComputer Engineering Department, Univesitat Politècnica de València (UPV), 46022, Valencia, Spain. jmcecilia@disca.upv.es.

Funding

Conselleria de Innovación, Universidades, Ciencia y Sociedad Digital, Generalitat Valenciana ACIF/2018/219Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación RTC2019-007159-5Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación RTI2018-096384-B-I00Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación RYC2018-025580-I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are witnessing the dramatic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic which, unfortunately, go beyond the impact on the health system. Until herd immunity is achieved with vaccines, the only available mechanisms for controlling the pandemic are quarantines, perimeter closures and social distancing with the aim of reducing mobility. Governments only apply these measures for a reduced period, since they involve the closure of economic activities such as tourism, cultural activities, or nightlife. The main criterion for establishing these measures and planning socioeconomic subsidies is the evolution of infections. However, the collapse of the health system and the unpredictability of human behavior, among others, make it difficult to predict this evolution in the short to medium term. This article evaluates different models for the early prediction of the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic to create a decision support system for policy-makers. We consider a wide branch of models including artificial neural networks such as LSTM and GRU and statistically based models such as autoregressive (AR) or ARIMA. Moreover, several consensus strategies to ensemble all models into one system are proposed to obtain better results in this uncertain environment. Finally, a multivariate model that includes mobility data provided by Google is proposed to better forecast trend changes in the 14-day CI. A real case study in Spain is evaluated, providing very accurate results for the prediction of 14-day CI in scenarios with and without trend changes, reaching 0.93 [Formula: see text], 4.16 RMSE and 1.08 MAE.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCOVID-19ForecastingHumansIncidenceModels, StatisticalNeural Networks, ComputerSpain

Identifiers

PMID34312455
PMCPMC8313557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.