Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34312396›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2021

Evaluation of multiple transcriptomic gene risk signatures in male breast cancer.

Jane Bayani, Coralie Poncet, Cheryl Crozier, Anouk Neven, Tammy Piper, Carrie Cunningham, Monika Sobol, Stefan Aebi, Kim Benstead, Oliver Bogler and 27 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. The Oncotype DX® 21-gene recurrence score and clinical outcomes in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative male breast cancer: a scoping review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors at 20 institutions in 10 countries.

Jane Bayani *Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Coralie Poncet *Department of Statistics, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium.
Cheryl CrozierOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0697-9913
Anouk NevenDepartment of Statistics, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2253-0427
Tammy PiperUniversity of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Carrie CunninghamUniversity of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Monika SobolUniversity of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Stefan AebiSwiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3383-9449
Kim BensteadDepartment of Oncology, Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, UK.
Oliver BoglerGlobal Academic Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Lissandra Dal LagoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium.
Judith FraserBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Florentine HilbersBreast International Group, Brussels, Belgium.
Ingrid HedenfalkDivision of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6840-3397
Larissa KordeUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Barbro LinderholmDepartment of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
John MartensMedical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam; BOOG, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3428-3366
Lavinia MiddletonDepartment Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Melissa MurrayDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2935-6014
Catherine KellyAll Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG), Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8355-6714
Cecilia NilssonDepartment of Oncology, Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden.
Monika NowaczykSpecialist Hospital. St. Wojciech, Gdansk, Poland.
Stephanie PeetersDepartment of Radiation Oncology Maastro, Masstricht, The Netherlands.
Aleksandra PericDepartment of Statistics, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium.
Peggy PorterDivisions of Human Biology and Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center & Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Carolien SchröderDepartment Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen; BOOG, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Isabel T RubioBreast Surgical Unit. Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Kathryn J RuddyMayo Clinic, Department of Oncology, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6298-332X
Christi van AsperenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center; BOOG, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Danielle Van Den WeyngaertDepartment of Radiotherapy, ZNA Middelheim, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Carolien van DeurzenDepartment Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center; BOOG, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Elise van Leeuwen-StokDutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joanna VermeijDepartment of Medical Oncology, ZNA Jan Palfijn, Merksem, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0041-6957
Eric WinerDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8819-1723
Sharon H GiordanoUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Fatima CardosoBreast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation; EORTC, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6692-2249
John M S BartlettOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada. John.Bartlett@oicr.on.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0347-3888
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer · BEOntario Institute for Cancer Research · CAThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Edinburgh · GBErasmus MC · NLUniversity of Washington · USAZ Sint-Jan · BEBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBBreast International Group · BECancer Trials Ireland · IEChampalimaud Foundation · PTCheltenham General Hospital · GBDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USInstitut Jules Bordet · BELeiden University Medical Center · NLLund University · SEMaastro Clinic · NLMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USSahlgrenska University Hospital · SE

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male breast cancer (BCa) is a rare disease accounting for less than 1% of all breast cancers and 1% of all cancers in males. The clinical management is largely extrapolated from female BCa. Several multigene assays are increasingly used to guide clinical treatment decisions in female BCa, however, there are limited data on the utility of these tests in male BCa. Here we present the gene expression results of 381 M0, ER+ve, HER2-ve male BCa patients enrolled in the Part 1 (retrospective analysis) of the International Male Breast Cancer Program. Using a custom NanoString™ panel comprised of the genes from the commercial risk tests Prosigna®, OncotypeDX®, and MammaPrint®, risk scores and intrinsic subtyping data were generated to recapitulate the commercial tests as described by us previously. We also examined the prognostic value of other risk scores such as the Genomic Grade Index (GGI), IHC4-mRNA and our prognostic 95-gene signature. In this sample set of male BCa, we demonstrated prognostic utility on univariate analysis. Across all signatures, patients whose samples were identified as low-risk experienced better outcomes than intermediate-risk, with those classed as high risk experiencing the poorest outcomes. As seen with female BCa, the concordance between tests was poor, with C-index values ranging from 40.3% to 78.2% and Kappa values ranging from 0.17 to 0.58. To our knowledge, this is the largest study of male breast cancers assayed to generate risk scores of the current commercial and academic risk tests demonstrating comparable clinical utility to female BCa.

Identifiers

PMID34312396
PMCPMC8313692
OpenAlexW3186622353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.