Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34312208›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Comparative 4-year risk and type of hospital admission among homeless and housed emergency department attendees: longitudinal study of hospital records in England 2013-2018.

Charlie Moss, Matt Sutton, Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi, Caroline Sanders, Thomas Allen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploring the experiences and preferences of South Asian patients' of primary care in England since COVID-19.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  7. The homeless, seizures, and epilepsy: a review.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2023
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Charlie MossHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK charlie.moss@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4694-378X
Matt SuttonHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Sudeh Cheraghi-SohiNIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Caroline SandersNIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Thomas AllenManchester Centre for Health Economics, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2972-7911
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPeople experiencing homelessness are frequent users of secondary care. Currently, there is no study of potentially preventable admissions for homeless patients in England. We aim to estimate the number of potentially preventable hospital admissions for homeless patients and compare to housed patients with similar characteristics.

designRetrospective matched cohort study.

settingHospitals in England.

participants16 161 homeless patients and 74 780 housed patients aged 16-75 years who attended an emergency department (ED) in England in 2013/2014, matched on the basis of age, sex, ED attended and primary diagnosis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Annual counts of admissions, emergency admissions, ambulatory care-sensitive (ACS) emergency admissions, acute ACS emergency admissions and chronic ACS emergency admissions over the following 4 years (2014/2015-2017/2018). We additionally compare the prevalence of specific ACS conditions for homeless and housed patients.

resultsMean admissions per 1000 patients per year were 470 for homeless patients and 230 for housed patients. Adjusted for confounders, annual admissions were 1.79 times higher (incident rate ratio (IRR)=1.79; 95% CI 1.69 to 1.90), emergency admissions 2.08 times higher (IRR=2.08; 95% CI 1.95 to 2.21) and ACS admissions 1.65 times higher (IRR=1.65; 95% CI 1.51 to 1.80), compared with housed patients. The effect was greater for acute (IRR=1.78; 95% CI 1.64 to 1.93) than chronic (IRR=1.45; 95% CI 1.27 to 1.66) ACS conditions. ACS conditions that were relatively more common for homeless patients were cellulitis, convulsions/epilepsy and chronic angina.

conclusionsHomeless patients use hospital services at higher rates than housed patients, particularly emergency admissions. ACS admissions of homeless patients are higher which suggests some admissions may be potentially preventable with improved access to primary care. However, these admissions comprise a small share of total admissions.

Indexed as

Hospital RecordsIll-Housed PersonsCohort StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalEnglandHospitalsHumansLongitudinal StudiesRetrospective Studiesaccident & emergency medicinepublic healthsocial medicine

Identifiers

PMID34312208
PMCPMC8314693
OpenAlexW3184995403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.