Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34312199›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Virtual communities of practice to improve clinical outcomes in healthcare: protocol for a 10-year scoping review.

Louise Shaw, Dana Jazayeri, Debra Kiegaldie, Meg Morris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Digital knowledge dissemination: The Global Alliance for Nursing and Midwifery community of practice.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Louise ShawFaculty of Health Science, Youth & Community Studies, Holmesglen Institute of TAFE, Parkdale, Victoria, Australia louise.shaw@holmesglen.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8188-2313
Dana JazayeriSchool of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, Faculty of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Debra KiegaldieFaculty of Health Science, Youth & Community Studies, Holmesglen Institute of TAFE, Parkdale, Victoria, Australia.
Meg MorrisSchool of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, Faculty of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0114-4175

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVirtual communities of practice (VCoPs) use a common online platform to provide healthcare professionals with the opportunity to access highly specialised knowledge, build a professional support network and promote the translation of research evidence into practice. There is limited reporting of how best to design and administer VCoPs within healthcare organisations. The primary aim of this scoping review is to identify the best methods used to establish and maintain VCoPs. Findings shall be used to develop a flexible framework to guide the establishment and facilitation of a VCoP for healthcare professionals to ensure the translation of falls prevention clinical guidelines into practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A five-stage scoping review process will be followed based on Arksey and O'Malley's framework and refined by the Joanna Briggs Institute Methodology. An initial limited search of PubMed and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature will identify relevant studies and assist with search term development. This will be followed by a search of five online databases to identify papers published from January 2010 until November 2020. Papers will be independently screened by two reviewers, and data extracted and analysed using a reporting framework. Qualitative data will be analysed thematically and numerical synthesis of the data will be conducted. RESULTS AND DISSEMINATION: The results of this scoping review will highlight the best ways to design and manage VCoPs in healthcare organisations. The findings will be presented at relevant stakeholder workshops, conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelCommunity Health ServicesHealth FacilitiesHumansPeer ReviewResearch DesignScoping Reviews as Topiceducation & training (see medical education & training)health & safetyprotocols & guidelinesquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID34312199
PMCPMC8314687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.