Trial reportBMJ global health2021
Another voice in the crowd: the challenge of changing family planning and child feeding practices through mHealth messaging in rural central India.
Trial report in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- A mobile messaging service for families on postnatal knowledge and practices: a cluster randomized trial, India.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025Trial
- The impact of a direct to beneficiary mobile communication program on reproductive and child health outcomes: a randomised controlled trial in India.BMJ global health · 2022Trial
- Does exposure to health information through mobile phones increase immunisation knowledge, completeness and timeliness in rural India?BMJ global health · 2021Trial
- Chat-Based Decision Support System for the Maternal Health Journey in Assam, India: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Multiphase Implementation Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Factors Affecting Family Planning Adoption in Migrant Communities: A Cross-Sectional Study From Central India.Cureus · 2026Article
- Developing a Gender Framework for Responsive and Adaptive Design in Digital Health (FORWARD) from a review of reviews.BMC digital health · 2025Article
- Relationship between big five personality and health literacy in elderly patients with chronic diseases: the mediating roles of family communication and self-efficacy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Use of modern technologies for promoting health at the population level in India.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024Review
- mHealth interventions for postpartum family planning in LMICs: A realist review.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Mobile health (mHealth) interventions for health promotion during the perinatal period in India: a scoping review.Frontiers in global women's health · 2024Article
- A systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis of factors affecting mHealth adoption in India.Oxford open digital health · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Optimising the reach of mobile health messaging programmes: an analysis of system generated data for the Kilkari programme across 13 states in India.BMJ global health · 2022Review
- Article
- Using behavioural design and theories of change to integrate communication solutions into health systems in India: evolution, evidence and learnings from practice.Integrated healthcare journal · 2022Review
- Freedom within a cage: how patriarchal gender norms limit women's use of mobile phones in rural central India.BMJ global health · 2021Article
- Can health information through mobile phones close the divide in health behaviours among the marginalised? An equity analysis of Kilkari in Madhya Pradesh, India.BMJ global health · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionKilkari is one of the world's largest mobile phone-based health messaging programmes. Developed by BBC Media Action, it provides weekly stage-based information to pregnant and postpartum women and their families, including on infant and young child feeding (IYCF) and family planning, to compliment the efforts of frontline health workers. The quantitative component of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in the Indian state of Madhya Pradesh found that exposure to Kilkari increased modern contraceptive uptake but did not change IYCF practices. This qualitative research complements the RCT to explore why these findings may have emerged.
methodsWe used system generated data to identify households within the RCT with very high to medium Kilkari listenership. Mothers (n=29), as well as husbands and extended family members (n=25 interviews/family group discussions) were interviewed about IYCF and family planning, including their reactions to Kilkari's calls on these topics. Analysis was informed by the theory of reciprocal determinism, which positions behaviour change within the interacting domains of individual attributes, social and environmental determinants, and existing practices.
resultsWhile women who owned and controlled their own phones were the Kilkari listeners, among women who did not own their own phones, it was often their husbands who listened. Spouses did not discuss Kilkari messages. Respondents retained and appreciated Kilkari messages that aligned with their pre-existing worldviews, social norms, and existing practices. However, they overlooked or de-emphasised content that did not. In this way, they reported agreeing with and trusting Kilkari while persisting with practices that went against Kilkari's recommendations, particularly non-exclusive breastfeeding and inappropriate complementary feeding.
conclusionTo deepen impact, digital direct to beneficiary services need to be complimented by wider communication efforts (e.g., sustained face-to-face, media, community engagement) to change social norms, taking into account the role of socio-environmental, behavioural, and individual determinants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.