Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34312156›Full record

Trial reportBMJ global health2021

Another voice in the crowd: the challenge of changing family planning and child feeding practices through mHealth messaging in rural central India.

Kerry Scott, Osama Ummer, Aashaka Shinde, Manjula Sharma, Shalini Yadav, Anushree Jairath, Nikita Purty, Neha Shah, Diwakar Mohan, Sara Chamberlain and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kerry ScottDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA kscott26@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3597-9637
Osama UmmerOxford Policy Management, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4189-5328
Aashaka ShindeDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Manjula SharmaIndependent researcher, New Delhi, India.
Shalini YadavIndependent researcher, New Delhi, India.
Anushree JairathIndependent researcher, New Delhi, India.
Nikita PurtyOxford Policy Management, New Delhi, India.
Neha ShahDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9450-604X
Diwakar MohanDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Sara ChamberlainBBC Media Action, New Delhi, India.
Amnesty Elizabeth LeFevreDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8437-7240
Kilkari Impact Evaluation team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionKilkari is one of the world's largest mobile phone-based health messaging programmes. Developed by BBC Media Action, it provides weekly stage-based information to pregnant and postpartum women and their families, including on infant and young child feeding (IYCF) and family planning, to compliment the efforts of frontline health workers. The quantitative component of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in the Indian state of Madhya Pradesh found that exposure to Kilkari increased modern contraceptive uptake but did not change IYCF practices. This qualitative research complements the RCT to explore why these findings may have emerged.

methodsWe used system generated data to identify households within the RCT with very high to medium Kilkari listenership. Mothers (n=29), as well as husbands and extended family members (n=25 interviews/family group discussions) were interviewed about IYCF and family planning, including their reactions to Kilkari's calls on these topics. Analysis was informed by the theory of reciprocal determinism, which positions behaviour change within the interacting domains of individual attributes, social and environmental determinants, and existing practices.

resultsWhile women who owned and controlled their own phones were the Kilkari listeners, among women who did not own their own phones, it was often their husbands who listened. Spouses did not discuss Kilkari messages. Respondents retained and appreciated Kilkari messages that aligned with their pre-existing worldviews, social norms, and existing practices. However, they overlooked or de-emphasised content that did not. In this way, they reported agreeing with and trusting Kilkari while persisting with practices that went against Kilkari's recommendations, particularly non-exclusive breastfeeding and inappropriate complementary feeding.

conclusionTo deepen impact, digital direct to beneficiary services need to be complimented by wider communication efforts (e.g., sustained face-to-face, media, community engagement) to change social norms, taking into account the role of socio-environmental, behavioural, and individual determinants.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneTelemedicineChildFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansIndiaInfantMothersPregnancychild healthhealth education and promotionhealth services researchhealth systemspublic health

Identifiers

PMID34312156
PMCPMC8327813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.