Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34312153›Full record

Trial reportBMJ global health2021

Does exposure to health information through mobile phones increase immunisation knowledge, completeness and timeliness in rural India?

Arpita Chakraborty, Diwakar Mohan, Kerry Scott, Agrima Sahore, Neha Shah, Nayan Kumar, Osama Ummer, Jean Juste Harrisson Bashingwa, Sara Chamberlain, Priyanka Dutt and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03576157 (Impact Evaluation of Maternal Health Information Messaging in India), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03576157 nacompletednot on this map

Impact Evaluation of Maternal Health Information Messaging in India

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthRan2018 to 2021Enrolled5,095ConditionsBreast Feeding, Family Planning, Essential Newborn Care, Training of Frontline Health WorkersArmsKilkari
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Arpita ChakrabortyStatistics, Evidence, Accountability Programme, Oxford Policy Management, New Delhi, India arpita.chakraborty@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0515-3420
Diwakar MohanDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Kerry ScottDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Agrima SahoreStatistics, Evidence, Accountability Programme, Oxford Policy Management, New Delhi, India.
Neha ShahDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9450-604X
Nayan KumarStatistics, Evidence, Accountability Programme, Oxford Policy Management, New Delhi, India.
Osama UmmerStatistics, Evidence, Accountability Programme, Oxford Policy Management, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4189-5328
Jean Juste Harrisson BashingwaComputational Biology Division, Department of Integrative Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine (IDM), University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1433-4397
Sara ChamberlainBBC Media Action India, New Delhi, India.
Priyanka DuttBBC Media Action India, New Delhi, India.
Anna GodfreyBBC Media Action, London, UK.
Amnesty Elizabeth LeFevreDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8437-7240
Kilkari Impact Evaluation Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImmunisation plays a vital role in reducing child mortality and morbidity against preventable diseases. As part of a randomised controlled trial in rural Madhya Pradesh, India to assess the impact of Kilkari, a maternal messaging programme, we explored determinants of parental immunisation knowledge and immunisation practice (completeness and timeliness) for children 0-12 months of age from four districts in Madhya Pradesh.

methodsData were drawn from a cross-sectional survey of women (n=4423) with access to a mobile phone and their spouses (n=3781). Parental knowledge about immunisation and their child's receipt of vaccines, including timeliness and completeness, was assessed using self-reports and vaccination cards. Ordered logistic regressions were used to analyse the factors associated with parental immunisation knowledge. A Heckman two-stage probit model was used to analyse completeness and timeliness of immunisation after correcting for selection bias from being able to produce the immunisation card.

resultsOne-third (33%) of women and men knew the timing for the start of vaccinations, diseases linked to immunisations and the benefits of Vitamin-A. Less than half of children had received the basic package of 8 vaccines (47%) and the comprehensive package of 19 vaccines (44%). Wealth was the most significant determinant of men's knowledge and of the child receiving complete and timely immunisation for both basic and comprehensive packages. Exposure to Kilkari content on immunisation was significantly associated with an increase in men's knowledge (but not women's) about child immunisation (OR: 1.23, 95% CI 1.02 to1.48) and an increase in the timeliness of the child receiving vaccination at birth (Probit coefficient: 0.08, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.24).

conclusionGaps in complete and timely immunisation for infants persist in rural India. Mobile messaging programmes, supported by mass media messages, may provide one important source for bolstering awareness, uptake and timeliness of immunisation services. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03576157.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneVaccinationChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImmunizationImmunization ScheduleIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornMalechild healthcross-sectional surveyhealth policyimmunisation

Identifiers

PMID34312153
PMCPMC8728358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.