Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34312122›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2022

Corneal confocal microscopy identifies corneal nerve fibre loss and increased dendritic cells in patients with long COVID.

Gulfidan Bitirgen, Celalettin Korkmaz, Adil Zamani, Ahmet Ozkagnici, Nazmi Zengin, Georgios Ponirakis, Rayaz A Malik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neuroimmune pathophysiology of long COVID.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gulfidan BitirgenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Medical Faculty Hospital, Konya, Turkey gbitirgen@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0509-5649
Celalettin KorkmazDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Medical Faculty Hospital, Konya, Turkey.
Adil ZamaniDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Medical Faculty Hospital, Konya, Turkey.
Ahmet OzkagniciDepartment of Ophthalmology, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Medical Faculty Hospital, Konya, Turkey.
Nazmi ZenginDepartment of Ophthalmology, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Medical Faculty Hospital, Konya, Turkey.
Georgios PonirakisDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.
Rayaz A MalikDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-7188-8903

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsLong COVID is characterised by a range of potentially debilitating symptoms which develop in at least 10% of people who have recovered from acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study has quantified corneal sub-basal nerve plexus morphology and dendritic cell (DC) density in patients with and without long COVID.

methodsForty subjects who had recovered from COVID-19 and 30 control participants were included in this cross-sectional comparative study undertaken at a university hospital. All patients underwent assessment with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) long COVID, Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) and Fibromyalgia questionnaires, and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) to quantify corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD), corneal nerve fibre length (CNFL), and total, mature and immature DC density.

resultsThe mean time after the diagnosis of COVID-19 was 3.7±1.5 months. Patients with neurological symptoms 4 weeks after acute COVID-19 had a lower CNFD (p=0.032), CNBD (p=0.020), and CNFL (p=0.012), and increased DC density (p=0.046) compared with controls, while patients without neurological symptoms had comparable corneal nerve parameters, but increased DC density (p=0.003). There were significant correlations between the total score on the NICE long COVID questionnaire at 4 and 12 weeks with CNFD (ρ=-0.436; p=0.005, ρ=-0.387; p=0.038, respectively) and CNFL (ρ=-0.404; p=0.010, ρ=-0.412; p=0.026, respectively).

conclusionCorneal confocal microscopy identifies corneal small nerve fibre loss and increased DCs in patients with long COVID, especially those with neurological symptoms. CCM could be used to objectively identify patients with long COVID.

Indexed as

COVID-19CorneaCross-Sectional StudiesDendritic CellsHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalNerve FibersPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeSARS-CoV-2corneaCovid-19imaging

Identifiers

PMID34312122
PMCPMC8359871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.