Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34312064›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2021

Twin studies to GWAS: there and back again.

Naomi P Friedman, Marie T Banich, Matthew C Keller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Research Review: A review of the past decade of family and genomic studies on adolescent mental health.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Naomi P FriedmanDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA; Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA. Electronic address: naomi.friedman@colorado.edu.
Marie T BanichDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA; Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Matthew C KellerDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA; Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.

Funding

Adolescent Substance Use Initiation: Disentangling neurocognitive risks from consequences using longitudinal and genetically-informed methodsU01DA041120 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Monica Luciana, Sylia Wilson · 2015 to 2026
$34.5M
14/21 ABCD-USA Consortium: Research Project Site at CU BoulderU01DA051018 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI Marie T Banich, Naomi P. Friedman · 2020 to 2026
$11.4M
Neural Substrates of Executive Function: An fMRI Twin StudyR01MH063207 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI FRIEDMAN, NAOMI P. · 2001 to 2018
$6.5M
Estimating the genetic and environmental architecture of psychiatric disordersR01MH100141 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI KELLER, MATTHEW CHARLES · 2013 to 2022
$5.3M
Brain and Genetic Predictors of Individual Differences in Pain and Placebo AnalgesiaR01DA046064 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI FRIEDMAN, NAOMI P., WAGER, TOR D. · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
A Twin Study of Adolescent Alcohol and Drug Use Development: Leveraging Intensive Longitudinal AssessmentsU01DA046413 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI FRIEDMAN, NAOMI P., VRIEZE, SCOTT IAN · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
Integrative Prioritization of Alcohol and Drug-Addiction Related Genetic LociR01DA042742 · NIDA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI PALMER, ROHAN HUGH CRAIG · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
Executive Functions and Self-Regulation: A Twin StudyR56MH063207 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI HEWITT, JOHN K. · 2007 to 2007
$490k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA042742NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA046064NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041120NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA046413NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA051018NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063207NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100141NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH063207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of human behavioral genetics has come full circle. It began by using twin/family studies to estimate the relative importance of genetic and environmental influences. As large-scale genotyping became cost-effective, genome-wide association studies (GWASs) yielded insights about the nature of genetic influences and new methods that use GWAS data to estimate heritability and genetic correlations invigorated the field. Yet these newer GWAS methods have not replaced twin/family studies. In this review, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the two approaches with respect to characterizing genetic and environmental influences, measurement of behavioral phenotypes, and evaluation of causal models, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience. This discussion highlights how twin/family studies and GWAS complement and mutually reinforce one another.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyTwinsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumanscausalityenvironmentfamily studiesgenesgeneticsheritability

Identifiers

PMID34312064
PMCPMC8446317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.