Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34311929›Full record

ArticleVeterinary parasitology2019

In-home assessment of flea control and dermatologic lesions in dogs provided by lotilaner (Credelio®) and spinosad (Comfortis®) in west central Florida.

Michael W Dryden, Michael S Canfield, Brian H Herrin, Cara Bocon, Todd S Bress, Anna Hickert, Todd M Kollasch, Letitia Phan, Anthony J Rumschlag, William G Ryan and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary parasitology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Michael W DrydenDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA. Electronic address: dryden@vet.k-state.edu.
Michael S CanfieldAnimal Dermatology South, 7741 Congress Str, New Port Richey, FL 34653, USA. Electronic address: drmc@ahrpvet.com.
Brian H HerrinDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA. Electronic address: bhh@vet.k-state.edu.
Cara BoconDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA. Electronic address: cbocon@vet.k-state.edu.
Todd S BressAnimal Dermatology South, 7741 Congress Str, New Port Richey, FL 34653, USA. Electronic address: tbress@ahrpvet.com.
Anna HickertDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA. Electronic address: ahickert@vet.k-state.edu.
Todd M KollaschElanco Animal Health, 2500 Innovation Way, Greenfield, IN 46140, USA. Electronic address: kollasch_todd@elanco.com.
Letitia PhanDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA. Electronic address: lphan@vet.k-state.edu.
Anthony J RumschlagElanco Animal Health, 2500 Innovation Way, Greenfield, IN 46140, USA. Electronic address: rumschlag_anthony_j@elanco.com.
William G RyanRyan Mitchell Associates LLC, 16 Stoneleigh Park, Westfield, NJ 07090, USA. Electronic address: wgr@ryanmitch.com.
Bridgette SampeckDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA. Electronic address: basampec@vet.k-state.edu.
Nicole SmithAnimal Dermatology South, 7741 Congress Str, New Port Richey, FL 34653, USA. Electronic address: npesa@ahrpvet.com.
Vicki SmithDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA. Electronic address: vsmith@vet.k-state.edu.
Stanislaw A WarcholekDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA. Electronic address: swarcholek@vet.k-state.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-launch field investigations of recently-approved flea control products establish an efficacy baseline and in subsequent years can detect any efficacy decline suggestive of emerging resistance. As part of a continuing program of yearly assessment of flea control products in west central Florida, this study, using client-owned dogs, investigated the efficacy of lotilaner and spinosad in controlling fleas and in alleviating dermatologic signs likely associated with flea infestations. Forty-four qualifying households were randomized to either a lotilaner (Credelio®) (minimum dose rate 20 mg/kg) or a spinosad (Comfortis®) (30 mg/kg) group, with 33 and 36 dogs in each group, respectively. On Days 0 and 28 (±2) all dogs in each household were treated with the allocated product according to label directions, and all household cats received spinetoram (Cheristin®). On Day 0 and at weekly intervals through Day 56 (±2), on-animal and premises flea burdens were enumerated, a veterinary dermatologist scored integumental changes using canine atopic dermatitis extent and severity index (CADESI)-4 and flea allergy dermatitis (FAD) scales, and owners scored pruritus using the validated canine pruritus severity scale (CPSS). At study entry geometric mean flea counts were 33.2 and 29.9 in the lotilaner and spinosad groups, respectively. For both groups, reductions in flea counts were > 99% at the first post-treatment assessment (Week 1), and 100% from Week 6 through the final assessment (Week 8) when all study dogs were flea-free. For both groups, at each timepoint, flea counts on dogs and in traps were significantly reduced compared to the initial assessment (p < 0.001), as were improvements in median CADESI-4, FAD and CPSS scores (p ≤ 0.001). At Week 4, the geometric mean flea count on dogs in the lotilaner group (0.1) was significantly lower than that of dogs in the spinosad group (0.6) (p = 0.027), significantly fewer dogs in the lotilaner group were found to have fleas (p = 0.034), and mean owner-rated pruritus scores were significantly lower (p = 0.025). Under field conditions favoring heavy flea challenge, two consecutive monthly treatments of dogs with either lotilaner or spinosad produced a 100% reduction in canine flea infestations and dramatic improvements in dermatologic lesions and pruritus, based on scoring by a veterinary dermatologist and by dog owners. Household flea burdens were driven to extinction in all but one home in each treatment group.

Indexed as

DermatitisDogField studyFleaIsoxazolineLotilanerSpinosad

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.