Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34311779›Full record

ArticlePorcine health management2021

Effectiveness and costs of interventions to reduce the within-farm Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence on pig farms in the Netherlands.

Dorien M Eppink, Henk J Wisselink, Inge M Krijger, Joke W B van der Giessen, Manon Swanenburg, Coen P A van Wagenberg, Marcel A P M van Asseldonk, Martijn Bouwknegt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Porcine health management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dorien M EppinkVan Hall Larenstein, Velp, The Netherlands.
Henk J WisselinkWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands. henk.wisselink@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3747-8054
Inge M KrijgerKennis- en Adviescentrum Dierplagen, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Joke W B van der GiessenNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Manon SwanenburgWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Coen P A van WagenbergWageningen Economic Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Marcel A P M van AsseldonkWageningen Economic Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Martijn BouwknegtVion Food Group, Boxtel, The Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NLNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLVan Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences · NLVion Food Group (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

ministerie van economische zaken ministerie van economische zakenvion food group vion food group
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe parasite Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) is recognized as one of the major foodborne pathogens with a high human disease burden. To control T. gondii infections in pigs, European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) advises serological testing of pigs and audits of pig farms to identify risk factors for T. gondii infection. In line with this approach, the aim of the current study was to assess the effectiveness and costs of intervention measures implemented to reduce the T. gondii seroprevalence on finishing pig farms in the Netherlands. A crossover clinical trial was conducted at five case farms were their own control and the cross-over moment was the implementation of interventions to reduce risk factors. Each of the case farms had a farm-specific intervention strategy with one principal intervention measure (neutering of cats, professional rodent control or covering food storage).

resultsAll finishing pig farms (n = 5) showed a reduction in T. gondii seroprevalence within one year of implementing the intervention strategy. Cat neutering (n = 3) and feed coverage (n = 1) showed statistically significant reductions in seroprevalence. Rodent control (n = 1) did not show a statistically significant reduction. The estimated reduction in seroprevalence in response to the neutering of cats and feed coverage were 67 and 96 %, respectively.

conclusionsOur work demonstrates that it is possible to reduce the within-farm T. gondii seroprevalence within one year after interventions were implemented to reduce T. gondii risk factors. This information is essential and encouraging for policy makers, food business operators, and farmers to implement in their risk assessment and to apply to food safety control systems.

Indexed as

AuditsCatsInterventionsPigsRisk factorsRodent controlSeroprevalenceToxoplasma gondii

Identifiers

PMID34311779
PMCPMC8311922
OpenAlexW3184252775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.