Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34311766›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

The TANDEM trial: protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial of a complex intervention for anxiety and/or depression in people living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Moira Kelly, Liz Steed, Ratna Sohanpal, Hilary Pinnock, Amy Barradell, Clarisse Dibao-Dina, Kristie-Marie Mammoliti, Vari Wileman, Vickie Rowland, Sian Newton and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Correlation of Serum IL-18, BDNF, and IL-1Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Moira KellyCentre for Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Yvonne Carter Building, 58, Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK. m.j.kelly@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7911-1149
Liz SteedCentre for Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Yvonne Carter Building, 58, Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK.
Ratna SohanpalCentre for Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Yvonne Carter Building, 58, Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK.
Hilary PinnockAllergy and Respiratory Research Group, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Doorway 3, Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
Amy BarradellDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, College of Life Sciences, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre- Respiratory Glenfield Hospital, University of Leicester, Groby Road, Leicester, LE3 9QP, UK.
Clarisse Dibao-DinaUniversité de Tours, Université de Nantes, INSERM, SPHERE U1246, 10 Boulevard Tonnellé, B.P. 3223, 37044, Tours, cedex 1, France.
Kristie-Marie MammolitiBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit and WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Vari WilemanCentre for Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Yvonne Carter Building, 58, Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK.
Vickie RowlandDepartment of Health & Social Sciences, University of the West of England, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK.
Sian NewtonCentre for Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Yvonne Carter Building, 58, Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK.
Anna MooreThe Education Academy, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London, E1 1FR, UK.
Stephanie TaylorCentre for Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Yvonne Carter Building, 58, Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK.
Barts Health NHS Trust · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversité de Tours · FRUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of the West of England · GB

Funding

Health Technology Assessment Programme 13/146/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTANDEM is a randomised controlled trial of a complex healthcare intervention to improve the psychological and physical health of people living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and anxiety and/or depression. Based on health psychology theory set out in a logic model, respiratory health professionals were recruited and trained to deliver a cognitive behavioural approach intervention (The TANDEM intervention) under the supervision of senior cognitive behavioural practitioners. Here, we describe the protocol for the process evaluation commissioned alongside the trial. A realist approach that includes attention to describing contexts and mechanisms has been adopted.

methodsWe set up a multi-disciplinary team to develop and deliver the process evaluation. The mixed-methods design incorporates quantitative process data; monitoring of intervention fidelity; qualitative interviews with patients, carers, health professionals (facilitators) and clinical supervisors about their perspectives on acceptability of the intervention; and exploration with all stakeholders (including management/policy-makers) on future implementation. Normalisation process theory (NPT) will inform data collection and interpretation with a focus on implementation. Quantitative process data will be analysed descriptively. Qualitative interview data will be analysed before the trial outcomes are known using analytic induction and constant comparison to develop themes. Findings from the different elements will be reported separately and then integrated.

conclusionDetailed description and analysis of study processes in a research trial such as TANDEM enables research teams to describe study contexts and mechanisms and to examine the relationship with outcomes. In this way, learning from the trial goes beyond the randomised control trial (RCT) model where effectiveness is prioritised and makes it possible to explore issues arising for post-trial study implementation.

trial registrationISRCTN ISRCTN59537391 . Registered on 20 March 2017. Trial protocol version 6.0, 22 April 2018. Process evaluation protocol version 4.0, 1 November 2020.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAnxietyAnxiety DisordersDepressionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnxietyChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)Complex interventionDepressionImplementationProcess evaluation

Identifiers

PMID34311766
PMCPMC8313120
OpenAlexW3186278569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.