Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34311760›Full record

Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2021

Impact of a restrictive antibiotic policy on the acquisition of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in an endemic region: a before-and-after, propensity-matched cohort study in a Caribbean intensive care unit.

Christophe Le Terrier, Marco Vinetti, Paul Bonjean, Régine Richard, Bruno Jarrige, Bertrand Pons, Benjamin Madeux, Pascale Piednoir, Fanny Ardisson, Elain Elie and 6 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. High Prevalence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Christophe Le Terrier *Division of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Guadeloupe, Pointe-à-Pitre, Les Abymes, French West Indies, France. leterrier.icu@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5455-5576
Marco Vinetti *Division of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Guadeloupe, Pointe-à-Pitre, Les Abymes, French West Indies, France.
Paul BonjeanDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Régine RichardDivision of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Guadeloupe, Pointe-à-Pitre, Les Abymes, French West Indies, France.
Bruno JarrigeDivision of Hospital Infection Control, University Hospital of Guadeloupe, Pointe-à-Pitre, Les Abymes, French West Indies, France.
Bertrand PonsDivision of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Guadeloupe, Pointe-à-Pitre, Les Abymes, French West Indies, France.
Benjamin MadeuxDivision of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Guadeloupe, Pointe-à-Pitre, Les Abymes, French West Indies, France.
Pascale PiednoirDivision of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Guadeloupe, Pointe-à-Pitre, Les Abymes, French West Indies, France.
Fanny ArdissonDivision of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Guadeloupe, Pointe-à-Pitre, Les Abymes, French West Indies, France.
Elain ElieDivision of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Guadeloupe, Pointe-à-Pitre, Les Abymes, French West Indies, France.
Frédéric MartinoDivision of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Guadeloupe, Pointe-à-Pitre, Les Abymes, French West Indies, France.
Marc ValetteDivision of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Guadeloupe, Pointe-à-Pitre, Les Abymes, French West Indies, France.
Edouard OllierDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Sébastien BreurecLaboratory of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital of Guadeloupe, Pointe-à-Pitre, Les Abymes, French West Indies, France.
Michel CarlesDivision of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Guadeloupe, Pointe-à-Pitre, Les Abymes, French West Indies, France.
Guillaume ThiéryDivision of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Avenue Albert Raimond, 42270, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France. guillaume.thiery@chu-st-etienne.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-level antibiotic consumption plays a critical role in the selection and spread of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) in the ICU. Implementation of a stewardship program including a restrictive antibiotic policy was evaluated with respect to ESBL-E acquisition (carriage and infection).

methodsWe implemented a 2-year, before-and-after intervention study including all consecutive adult patients admitted for > 48 h in the medical-surgical 26-bed ICU of Guadeloupe University Hospital (French West Indies). A conventional strategy period (CSP) including a broad-spectrum antibiotic as initial empirical treatment, followed by de-escalation (period before), was compared to a restrictive strategy period (RSP) limiting broad-spectrum antibiotics and shortening their duration. Antibiotic therapy was delayed and initiated only after microbiological identification, except for septic shock, severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and meningitis (period after). A multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model adjusted on propensity score values was performed. The main outcome was the median time of being ESBL-E-free in the ICU. Secondary outcome included all-cause ICU mortality.

resultsThe study included 1541 patients: 738 in the CSP and 803 in the RSP. During the RSP, less patients were treated with antibiotics (46.8% vs. 57.9%; p < 0.01), treatment duration was shorter (5 vs. 6 days; p < 0.01), and administration of antibiotics targeting anaerobic pathogens significantly decreased (65.3% vs. 33.5%; p < 0.01) compared to the CSP. The incidence of ICU-acquired ESBL-E was lower (12.1% vs. 19%; p < 0.01) during the RSP. The median time of being ESBL-E-free was 22 days (95% CI 16-NA) in the RSP and 18 days (95% CI 16-21) in the CSP. After propensity score weighting and adjusted analysis, the median time of being ESBL-E-free was independently associated with the RSP (hazard ratio, 0.746 [95% CI 0.575-0.968]; p = 0.02, and hazard ratio 0.751 [95% CI 0.578-0.977]; p = 0.03, respectively). All-cause ICU mortality was lower in the RSP than in the CSP (22.5% vs. 28.6%; p < 0.01).

conclusionsImplementation of a program including a restrictive antibiotic strategy is feasible and is associated with less ESBL-E acquisition in the ICU without any worsening of patient outcome.

Indexed as

Health PolicyAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial Stewardshipbeta-LactamasesCohort StudiesEndemic DiseasesEnterobacterEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesAntibiotic stewardshipAntimicrobial resistanceCaribbeanESBL-E colonizationExtended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing EnterobacteriaceaeIntensive care unitIntestinal microbiota

Identifiers

PMID34311760
PMCPMC8311634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.