Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34311739›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2021

Physicians' decreased tendency to choose palliative care for patients with advanced dementia between 1999 and 2015.

Saila Haapasalmi, Reetta P Piili, Riina Metsänoja, Pirkko-Liisa I Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, Juho T Lehto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saila Haapasalmi *Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland. saila.haapasalmi@fimnet.fi.
Reetta P Piili *Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Riina MetsänojaFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Pirkko-Liisa I Kellokumpu-LehtinenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Juho T LehtoFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysicians' decision-making for seriously ill patients with advanced dementia is of high importance, especially as the prevalence of dementia is rising rapidly, and includes many challenging ethical, medical and juridical aspects. We assessed the change in this decision-making over 16 years (from 1999 to 2015) and several background factors influencing physicians' decision.

methodsA postal survey including a hypothetical patient-scenario representing a patient with an advanced dementia and a life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding was sent to 1182 and 1258 Finnish physicians in 1999 and 2015, respectively. The target groups were general practitioners (GPs), surgeons, internists and oncologists. The respondents were asked to choose between several life-prolonging and palliative care approaches. The influence of physicians' background factors and attitudes on their decision were assessed.

resultsThe response rate was 56%. A palliative care approach was chosen by 57 and 50% of the physicians in 1999 and 2015, respectively (p = 0.01). This change was statistically significant among GPs (50 vs 40%, p = 0.018) and oncologists (77 vs 56%, p = 0.011). GPs chose a palliative care approach less often than other responders in both years (50 vs. 63% in 1999 and 40 vs. 56% in 2015, p < 0.001). In logistic regression analysis, responding in 2015 and being a GP remained explanatory factors for a lower tendency to choose palliative care. The impact of family's benefit on the decision-making decreased, whereas the influence of the patient's benefit and ethical values as well as the patient's or physician's legal protection increased from 1999 to 2015.

conclusionsPhysicians chose a palliative care approach for a patient with advanced dementia and life-threatening bleeding less often in 2015 than in 1999. Specialty, attitudes and other background factors influenced significantly physician decision-making. Education on the identification and palliative care of the patients with late-stage dementia are needed to make these decisions more consistent.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDementiaGeneral PractitionersPalliative CareTerminal CareAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and QuestionnairesDecision-makingDementiaEnd-of-life carePhysician

Identifiers

PMID34311739
PMCPMC8312352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.