ArticleCancer cell international2021
Significance of initial, interim and end-of-therapy
Article in Cancer cell international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT in detecting high-grade transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and indolent lymphomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The British journal of radiology · 2025Pooled it
- Establishment and validation of a clinical threshold criteria for choosing PET imaging tracers for indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.EJNMMI research · 2025Article
- Comparison of standardized uptake value and standardized uptake lean body mass metrics inQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Baseline [BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Metabolic-immune axis in the tumor microenvironment: a new strategy for prognostic assessment and precision therapy in DLBCL and FL.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- A case of grade1 follicular lymphoma diagnosed by laparoscopic lymph node resection: differentiating from late lymph node recurrence of endometrial cancer.International cancer conference journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHistological transformation (HT) of follicular lymphoma to a more aggressive lymphoma is a serious event affecting patients' outcomes. To date, no strong clinical HT predictors present at diagnosis have yet been identified. The fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is highlighted as a non-invasive diagnostic tool for the detection of HT, but its ability to predict HT at early stage of disease has not been clear. Therefore, this study investigated the predictive values of the pre-transformation standardized uptake value (SUV
methodsThis retrospective study involved 219 patients with FL between June 2008 and October 2019 who had undergone
resultsOf the 219 patients included, 128 had low-grade FL (grade 1-2) and 91 had high-grade FL (grade 3a). HT eventually occurred in 30 patients. The median time to HT was 13.6 months. Among clinical indicators, advance pathological grade was shown as the most significant predictor of HT (HR = 4.561, 95% CI 1.604-12.965). We further assessed the relationship between PET and HT risk in FL. Univariate Cox regression determined that SUV
conclusionsIn follicular lymphoma, quantitative assessment used SUV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.