ReviewClinical endoscopy2021
Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Endoscopic Management of Peripancreatic Fluid Collections.
Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Therapeutic Endoscopic Ultrasound in Biliopancreatic Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in pediatric patients.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Biopsy Needle Integrated with Rotational Oblique Spectral Ultrasound (ROSUS) Imaging.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Guidelines for endoscopic treatment of postinflammatory pancreatic and peripancreatic fluid collections. Recommendations of the Endoscopic Surgery Section of the Association of Polish Surgeons, the Endoscopy Section of the Polish Society of Gastroenterology, the Polish Pancreatic Club, the Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery Section of the Association of Polish Surgeons, and the Pancreatic Surgery Section of the Association of Polish Surgeons; formulated by an expert panel led by Prof. Mateusz Jagielski, MD, PhD.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025Review
- Pancreatic Pseudocysts: Evolution of Treatment Approaches.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The evolving role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided lumen-apposing metal stents in the management of peri-pancreatic fluid collections.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Turkish Society of Gastroenterology: Pancreas Working Group, Acute Pancreatitis Committee Consensus Report.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Pancreatic Pseudocyst after Fully Covered Self-expandable Metallic Stent Placement.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Article
- Drainage for fluid collections post pancreatic surgery and acute pancreatitis: similar but different?Clinical endoscopy · 2024Review
- Advances in self-expandable metal stents for endoscopic ultrasound-guided interventions.Clinical endoscopy · 2024Review
- Use of an endoscopic powered debridement device for treatment of post-surgical fatty pancreatic necrosis.Clinical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin for the Differentiation of Mucinous Pancreatic Cystic Lesions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided intervention has gradually become a standard treatment for peripancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). However, it is difficult to popularize the procedure in Korea because of restrictions on insurance claims regarding the use of endoscopic accessories, as well as the lack of standardized Korean clinical practice guidelines. The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (KSGE) appointed a Task Force to develope medical guidelines by referring to the manual for clinical practice guidelines development prepared by the National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency. Previous studies on PFCs were searched, and certain studies were selected with the help of experts. Then, a set of key questions was selected, and treatment guidelines were systematically reviewed. Answers to these questions and recommendations were selected via peer review. This guideline discusses endoscopic management of PFCs and makes recommendations on Indications for the procedure, pre-procedural preparations, optimal approach for drainage, procedural considerations (e.g., types of stent, advantages and disadvantages of plastic and metal stents, and accessories), adverse events of endoscopic intervention, and procedural quality issues. This guideline was reviewed by external experts and suggests best practices recommended based on the evidence available at the time of preparation. This will be revised as necessary to address advances and changes in technology and evidence obtained in clinical practice and future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.