ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2021
Mitotic recombination in yeast: what we know and what we don't know.
Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection of "hidden" mitotic crossovers by long-read DNA sequencing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- PolyAdapt: Characterizing Polygenic Adaptive Architectures in the Presence of Strong Linkage Disequilibrium.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Improved genotype inference reveals cis- and trans-driven variation in the loss-of-heterozygosity rates in yeast.Genetics · 2026Article
- Article
- Splitting the yeast centromere by recombination.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Novel insights into the effects of 5-hydroxymethfurural on genomic instability and phenotypic evolution using a yeast model.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024Article
- Rad53 regulates the lifetime of Rdh54 at homologous recombination intermediates.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- CRI-SPA: a high-throughput method for systematic genetic editing of yeast libraries.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Nonlethal Furfural Exposure Causes Genomic Alterations and Adaptability Evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Practical Approaches for the YeastInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Shuffling the yeast genome using CRISPR/Cas9-generated DSBs that target the transposable Ty1 elements.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Genome-scale patterns in the loss of heterozygosity incidence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Genetics · 2022Article
- Global genomic instability caused by reduced expression of DNA polymerase ε in yeast.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- A mapping platform for mitotic crossover by single-cell multi-omics.Methods in enzymology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Saccharomyces cerevisiae is at the forefront of defining the major recombination mechanisms/models that repair targeted double-strand breaks during mitosis. Each of these models predicts specific molecular intermediates as well as genetic outcomes. Recent use of single-nucleotide polymorphisms to track the exchange of sequences in recombination products has provided an unprecedented level of detail about the corresponding intermediates and the extents to which different mechanisms are utilized. This approach also has revealed complexities that are not predicted by canonical models, suggesting that modifications to these models are needed. Current data are consistent with the initiation of most inter-homolog spontaneous mitotic recombination events by a double-strand break. In addition, the sister chromatid is preferred over the homolog as a repair template.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.