Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34311121›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2022

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Indices of Cortical Excitability Enhance the Prediction of Response to Pharmacotherapy in Late-Life Depression.

Jennifer I Lissemore, Benoit H Mulsant, Anthony J Bonner, Meryl A Butters, Robert Chen, Jonathan Downar, Jordan F Karp, Eric J Lenze, Tarek K Rajji, Charles F Reynolds and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer I LissemoreTemerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Benoit H MulsantDepartment of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anthony J BonnerDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Meryl A ButtersDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Robert ChenDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto and Krembil Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jonathan DownarDepartment of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; MRI-Guided rTMS Clinic and Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jordan F KarpDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine-Tucson, University of Arizona, Tuscon, Arizona.
Eric J LenzeHealthy Mind Lab, Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Tarek K RajjiTemerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Charles F ReynoldsDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Reza ZomorrodiTemerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Zafiris J DaskalakisDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, California.
Daniel M BlumbergerTemerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: daniel.blumberger@camh.ca.
University of Pittsburgh · USCentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAKrembil Foundation · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

3/3-Incomplete Response in Late-Life Depression: Getting to RemissionR01MH083643 · NIMH · CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH · PI MULSANT, BENOIT H · 2009 to 2013
$1.3M
3/3 Buprenorphine for Late-Life Treatment Resistant DepressionR34MH101365 · NIMH · CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH · PI BLUMBERGER, DANIEL M. · 2014 to 2016
$479k
CIHR MOP-123455NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083643NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH101365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults with late-life depression (LLD) often experience incomplete or lack of response to first-line pharmacotherapy. The treatment of LLD could be improved using objective biological measures to predict response. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to measure cortical excitability, inhibition, and plasticity, which have been implicated in LLD pathophysiology and associated with brain stimulation treatment outcomes in younger adults with depression. TMS measures have not yet been investigated as predictors of treatment outcomes in LLD or pharmacotherapy outcomes in adults of any age with depression.

methodsWe assessed whether pretreatment single-pulse and paired-pulse TMS measures, combined with clinical and demographic measures, predict venlafaxine treatment response in 76 outpatients with LLD. We compared the predictive performance of machine learning models including or excluding TMS predictors.

resultsTwo single-pulse TMS measures predicted venlafaxine response: cortical excitability (neuronal membrane excitability) and the variability of cortical excitability (dynamic fluctuations in excitability levels). In cross-validation, models using a combination of these TMS predictors, clinical markers of treatment resistance, and age classified patients with 73% ± 11% balanced accuracy (average correct classification rate of responders and nonresponders; permutation testing, p < .005); these models significantly outperformed (corrected t test, p = .025) models using clinical and demographic predictors alone (60% ± 10% balanced accuracy).

conclusionsThese preliminary findings suggest that single-pulse TMS measures of cortical excitability may be useful predictors of response to pharmacotherapy in LLD. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine whether combining TMS predictors with other biomarkers further improves the accuracy of predicting LLD treatment outcome.

Indexed as

Cortical ExcitabilityTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAgedDepressionHumansInhibition, PsychologicalVenlafaxine HydrochlorideVenlafaxine HydrochlorideCortical excitabilityGenetic algorithmGeriatric depressionLate-life depressionNeurophysiologyPredictive biomarkerSupport vector machineTMS

Identifiers

PMID34311121
PMCPMC8783923
OpenAlexW3186486636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.