ArticleInfection and immunity2021
Immunogenicity and Efficacy of Live-Attenuated
Article in Infection and immunity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of a Luminescence-Based Serum Bactericidal Activity Assay for Human Sera Against a Panel ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Identification of inhibitors of the Salmonella FraB deglycase, a drug target.FEBS open bio · 2025Article
- Article
- Recent Advances in Oral Vaccines for Animals.Veterinary sciences · 2024Review
- The role of tissue resident memory CD4 T cells in Salmonella infection: Implications for future vaccines.Vaccine · 2023Review
- Evaluation of Three Candidate Live-AttenuatedVaccines · 2023Article
- Reduced immunogenicity of a liveFrontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Preclinical evaluation of OMVs as potential vaccine candidates againstFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Salmonella Typhimurium is a common cause of foodborne gastroenteritis and a less frequent but important cause of invasive disease, especially in developing countries. In our previous work, we showed that a live-attenuated S. Typhimurium vaccine (CVD 1921) was safe and immunogenic in rhesus macaques, although shed for an unacceptably long period (10 days) postimmunization. Consequently, we engineered a new strain, CVD 1926, which was shown to be safe and immunogenic in mice, as well as less reactogenic in mice and human cell-derived organoids than CVD 1921. In this study, we assessed the reactogenicity and efficacy of CVD 1926 in rhesus macaques. Animals were given two doses of either CVD 1926 or saline perorally. The vaccine was well-tolerated, with shedding in stool limited to a mean of 5 days. All CVD 1926-immunized animals had both a serological and a T cell response to vaccination. At 4 weeks postimmunization, animals were challenged with wild-type S. Typhimurium I77. Unvaccinated (saline) animals had severe diarrhea, with two animals succumbing to infection. Animals receiving CVD 1926 were largely protected, with only one animal having moderate diarrhea. Vaccine efficacy in this gastroenteritis model was 80%. S. Typhimurium vaccine strain CVD 1926 was safe and effective in rhesus macaques and shed for a shorter period than other previously tested live-attenuated vaccine strains. This strain could be combined with other live-attenuated Salmonella vaccine strains to create a pan-Salmonella vaccine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.