Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34310706›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2021

Dyadic interactions and physical and social environment in dementia mealtime care: a systematic review of instruments.

Wen Liu, Sohyun Kim

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Occupational Therapy Practice Guidelines for Adults Living With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Neurocognitive Disorders.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wen LiuCollege of Nursing, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.ORCID 0000-0002-1491-7384
Sohyun KimCollege of Nursing, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.

Funding

Optimizing Mealtime (OPTIMAL): Development and Pilot Testing of a Person-Centered Mealtime Care Intervention for Nursing Home Residents with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD)K23AG066856 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI LIU, WEN · 2020 to 2024
$778k
Person-Centered and Task-Centered Care in Temporal Relation to Mealtime Difficulties and Food Intake for Nursing Home Residents with DementiaR03AG063170 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI LIU, WEN · 2019 to 2020
$337k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG066856NIA NIH HHS R03 AG063170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using valid instruments to measure dyadic interactions and physical and social environment during mealtime care of persons with dementia is critical to evaluate the process, fidelity, and impact of mealtime interventions. However, the characteristics and quality of existing instruments remain unexplored. This systematic review described the characteristics and synthesized the psychometric quality of instruments originally developed or later modified to measure mealtime dyadic interactions and physical and/or social dining environment for people with dementia, on the basis of published reports between January 1, 1980 and December 31, 2020. We identified 26 instruments: 17 assessed dyadic interactions, one assessed physical environment, and eight assessed physical and social environment. All instruments were used in research and none in clinical practice. All instruments were observational tools and scored as having low psychometric quality, except for the refined Cue Utilization and Engagement in Dementia (CUED) mealtime video-coding scheme rated as having moderate quality. Reasons for low quality are the use of small samples compared with the number of items, limited psychometric testing, and inadequate estimates. All existing tools warrant further testing in larger diverse samples in varied settings and validation for use in clinical practice. The refined CUED is a potential tool for use and requires testing in direct on-site observations.

Indexed as

Health Facility EnvironmentProfessional-Patient RelationsSocial EnvironmentDementiaHumansInterpersonal RelationsMealsPsychometricsdementiadyadic interactionsinstrumentsmealtimephysical environmentsocial environment

Identifiers

PMID34310706
PMCPMC8688242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.