Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34310694›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2021

Handling oxygenation targets in ICU patients with COVID-19-Protocol and statistical analysis plan in the HOT-COVID trial.

Frederik Mølgaard Nielsen, Thomas Lass Klitgaard, Elena Crescioli, Søren Rosborg Aagaard, Anne Sofie Andreasen, Lone Musaeus Poulsen, Martin Siegemund, Anne Craveiro Brøchner, Morten H Bestle, Susanne Andi Iversen and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Frederik Mølgaard NielsenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0071-1203
Thomas Lass KlitgaardDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8781-1206
Elena CrescioliDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8267-7634
Søren Rosborg AagaardDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Anne Sofie AndreasenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Lone Musaeus PoulsenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
Martin SiegemundDepartment of Intensive Care, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Anne Craveiro BrøchnerDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Kolding Hospital, Kolding, Denmark.
Morten H BestleCollaboration for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Susanne Andi IversenDepartment of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Björn A BrandDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Norway.
Jon Henrik LaakeDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Randers Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Thorbjørn GrøfteDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Thomas HildebrandtDepartment of Public Health, Section of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Theis LangeCollaboration for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anders PernerCollaboration for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Olav Lilleholt SchjørringDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7749-6003
Bodil Steen RasmussenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2190-145X
Aalborg University Hospital · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Copenhagen · DKHerlev Hospital · DKKolding Hospital · DKRegional Hospital Randers · DKUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHZealand University Hospital · DKZealand University Hospital Køge · DK

Funding

Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Research 0238-00004B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronavirus disease (COVID-19) primarily affects the lungs and lower airways and may present as hypoxaemic respiratory failure requiring admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) for supportive treatment. Here, supplemental oxygen remains essential for COVID-19 patient management, but the optimal dosage is not defined. We hypothesize that targeting an arterial partial pressure of oxygen of 8 kPa throughout ICU admission is superior to targeting 12 kPa.

methodsThe Handling Oxygenation Targets in ICU patients with COVID-19 (HOT-COVID) trial, is an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, multicentre, randomized, parallel-group trial comparing a lower oxygenation target versus a higher oxygenation target in adult ICU patients with COVID-19. The primary outcome is days alive without life-support (use of mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy or vasoactive therapy) at day 90. Secondary outcomes are 90-day and 1-year mortality, serious adverse events in the ICU and days alive and out of hospital in the 90-day period, health-related quality-of-life at 1 year, and health economic analyses. One-year follow-up of cognitive and pulmonary function is planned in a subgroup of Danish patients. We will include 780 patients to detect or reject an absolute increase in days alive without life-support of 7 days with an α of 5% and a β of 20%. An interim analysis is planned after 90-day follow-up of 390 patients.

conclusionsThe HOT-COVID trial will provide patient-important data on the effect of two oxygenation targets in ICU patients with COVID-19 and hypoxia. This protocol paper describes the background, design and statistical analysis plan for the trial.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultCritical CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsLungMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeCOVID-19hypoxiaintensive care unitsoxygen

Identifiers

PMID34310694
PMCPMC8441913
OpenAlexW3183520370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.