Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34310629›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Arthroplasty implants and materials: Cost awareness and value perception.

Mursal Gardezi, Taylor D Ottesen, Vineet Tyagi, Josiah J Z Sherman, Jonathan N Grauer, Lee E Rubin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Orthopaedic surgery residents report little subjective or objective familiarity with healthcare costs.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mursal GardeziYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2188-3167
Taylor D OttesenYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3777-1955
Vineet TyagiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
Josiah J Z ShermanYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
Jonathan N GrauerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, New Haven, CT, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2626-7278
Lee E RubinDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
Yale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NIA Short Term Research Training: Students in Health Professional SchoolsT35AG049685 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Sarwat I Chaudhry, Terri R. Fried · 2016 to 2026
$804k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIA NIH HHS T35 AG049685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arthroplasty procedures are commonly performed and contribute to healthcare expenditures seen in the United States. Surgical team members may make selections among implants and materials without always knowing their relative cost. The current study reports on a survey aimed to investigate the perceptions of an academic group about the relative cost and value of commonly used operating room implants and materials related to joint arthroplasty cases using 10 matched pairs of items. Of the 124 persons eligible to take the survey, 102 responded (response rate of 82.3%) including attendings, fellows, residents, physician assistants (PAs), advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) and registered nurses (RNs). On average for the ten pairs of items, the more expensive items were correctly selected by 90.2+/-13.9% (mean+/- standard deviation) of respondents with a range from 54.9% to 100%. Of note, the cost differences were significantly overestimated for 8/10 item pairs. The majority of respondents perceived the more expensive item as the item with the higher clinical value for 9/10 item pairs. Most arthroplasty attendings (91.3%) indicated willingness to use the less expensive item of two similar items. Nonetheless, 17.9% of fellows, residents, PAs, APRNs and RNs indicated that they would not feel comfortable suggesting using the less expensive item. Although attending arthroplasty surgeons stated a desire to consider costs, a knowledge deficit with regards to identifying the extent of cost differences was identified, and a significant portion of the surgical support team reported being hesitant to suggest less expensive options.

Indexed as

PerceptionArthroplastyBone CementsHealth ExpendituresHumansNursesPhysician AssistantsProstheses and ImplantsSurgeonsSurveys and QuestionnairesBone Cements

Identifiers

PMID34310629
PMCPMC8312923
OpenAlexW3184722199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.