ArticlePloS one2021
Compositional analysis of ruminal bacteria from ewes selected for somatic cell score and milk persistency.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Seasonal dynamics in sheep fecal microbiome and soil bacterial communities under grazing management.PloS one · 2026Article
- Dietary energy levels modulate rumen metabolites and function in sheep by regulating the rumen microbiome.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Multi-omics data elucidate parasite-host-microbiota interactions and resistance to Haemonchus contortus in sheep.Parasites & vectors · 2024Article
- Association of milk microbiome with bovine mastitis before and after antibiotic therapy.Veterinary world · 2023Article
- Time series cluster analysis reveals individual assignment of microbiota in captive tiger (Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- High-energy diet modify rumen microbial composition and microbial energy metabolism pattern in fattening sheep.BMC veterinary research · 2023Article
- A large database linking the rumen bacterial composition and milk traits in Lacaune sheep.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Host genetic control on rumen microbiota and its impact on dairy traits in sheep.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
- Preliminary Investigation of the Effects of Rosemary Extract Supplementation on Milk Production and Rumen Fermentation in High-Producing Dairy Cows.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Sequencing introduced false positive rare taxa lead to biased microbial community diversity, assembly, and interaction interpretation in amplicon studies.Environmental microbiome · 2022Article
- Variation in Rumen Bacteria of Lacaune Dairy Ewes From One Week to the Next.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Long-term effects of early-life rumen microbiota modulation on dairy cow production performance and methane emissions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Metagenomic Predictions: A Review 10 years on.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Apart From the Diet, the Ruminal Microbiota of Lambs Is Modified in Relation to Their Genetic Potential for Feed Efficiency or Feeding Behavior.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Effects of Dietary Modified Bazhen on Reproductive Performance, Immunity, Breast Milk Microbes, and Metabolome Characterization of Sows.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ruminants are dependent on their rumen microbiota to obtain energy from plants. The composition of the microbiome was well-known to be associated with health status, and production traits, but published results are difficult to reproduce due to large sources of variation. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the associations of ruminal microbiota and its association with genetic lines selected by somatic cell score (SCS) or milk persistency (PERS), as well as milk production, somatic cell score, fat and protein contents, and fatty acids and proteins of milk, using the principles of compositional data. A large sample of 700 Lacaune dairy ewes from INRAE La Fage feeding the same diet and belonging to two divergent genetic lines selected for SCS or PERS was used. The ruminal bacterial metagenome was sequenced using the 16S rRNA gene, resulting in 2,059 operational taxonomic units affiliated with 112 genera. The abundance data were centred log-transformed after the replacement of zeros with the geometric Bayesian method. Discriminant analysis of the SCS showed differences between SCS+ and SCS- ewes, while for PERS no difference was obtained. Milk traits as fat content, protein content, saturated fatty acids and caseins of milk were negatively associated with Prevotella (R = [-0.08;-0.16]), Suttonella (R = [-0.09;-0.16]) and Ruminococcus (R = [-0.08;-0.16]), and positively associated with Lachnospiraceae (R = [0.09;0.16]) and Christensenellaceae (R = [0.09;0.16]). Our findings provide an understanding of the application of compositional data to microbiome analysis, and the potential association of Prevotella, Suttonella, Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae with milk production traits such as milk fatty acids and proteins in dairy sheep.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.