Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34310617›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Compositional analysis of ruminal bacteria from ewes selected for somatic cell score and milk persistency.

Guillermo Martinez Boggio, Annabelle Meynadier, Pepus Daunis-I-Estadella, Christel Marie-Etancelin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Guillermo Martinez BoggioGenPhySE, INRAE, INPT, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Castanet-Tolosan, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3597-9426
Annabelle MeynadierGenPhySE, INRAE, INPT, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Castanet-Tolosan, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0631-6949
Pepus Daunis-I-EstadellaDepartment of Computer Science, Applied Mathematics and Statistics, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6134-9255
Christel Marie-EtancelinGenPhySE, INRAE, INPT, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse · FRUniversitat de Girona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ruminants are dependent on their rumen microbiota to obtain energy from plants. The composition of the microbiome was well-known to be associated with health status, and production traits, but published results are difficult to reproduce due to large sources of variation. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the associations of ruminal microbiota and its association with genetic lines selected by somatic cell score (SCS) or milk persistency (PERS), as well as milk production, somatic cell score, fat and protein contents, and fatty acids and proteins of milk, using the principles of compositional data. A large sample of 700 Lacaune dairy ewes from INRAE La Fage feeding the same diet and belonging to two divergent genetic lines selected for SCS or PERS was used. The ruminal bacterial metagenome was sequenced using the 16S rRNA gene, resulting in 2,059 operational taxonomic units affiliated with 112 genera. The abundance data were centred log-transformed after the replacement of zeros with the geometric Bayesian method. Discriminant analysis of the SCS showed differences between SCS+ and SCS- ewes, while for PERS no difference was obtained. Milk traits as fat content, protein content, saturated fatty acids and caseins of milk were negatively associated with Prevotella (R = [-0.08;-0.16]), Suttonella (R = [-0.09;-0.16]) and Ruminococcus (R = [-0.08;-0.16]), and positively associated with Lachnospiraceae (R = [0.09;0.16]) and Christensenellaceae (R = [0.09;0.16]). Our findings provide an understanding of the application of compositional data to microbiome analysis, and the potential association of Prevotella, Suttonella, Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae with milk production traits such as milk fatty acids and proteins in dairy sheep.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaBayes TheoremDietFatty AcidsFemaleLactationMetagenomeMicrobiotaMilkRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRumenSheepFatty AcidsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID34310617
PMCPMC8312953
OpenAlexW3184432465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.