Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34310616›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Sense of coherence, social support and religiosity as resources for medical personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic: A web-based survey among 4324 health care workers within the German Network University Medicine.

Jonas Schmuck, Nina Hiebel, Milena Rabe, Juliane Schneider, Yesim Erim, Eva Morawa, Lucia Jerg-Bretzke, Petra Beschoner, Christian Albus, Julian Hannemann and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Workload and mental health of nursing staff in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic-a scoping review].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. [Against the mental stress-Resilient work in surgery].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Pre- and Post-Pandemic Religiosity and Mental Health Outcomes: A Prospective Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  20. Loneliness before and after COVID-19: Sense of Coherence and Hope as Coping Mechanisms.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jonas SchmuckDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8719-3743
Nina HiebelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Milena RabeDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Juliane SchneiderDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9057-2867
Yesim ErimDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Eva MorawaDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Lucia Jerg-BretzkeDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Petra BeschonerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Christian AlbusDepartment of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Cologne, University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Julian HannemannDepartment of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Cologne, University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Kerstin WeidnerDepartment of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Susann Steudte-SchmiedgenDepartment of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Lukas RadbruchDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Holger BrunschDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Franziska GeiserDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
University Hospital Bonn · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DEUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic resulted in severe detrimental effects on the mental well-being of health care workers (HCW). Consequently, there has been a need to identify health-promoting resources in order to mitigate the psychological impact of the pandemic on HCW.

objectiveOur objective was to investigate the association of sense of coherence (SOC), social support and religiosity with self-reported mental symptoms and increase of subjective burden during the COVID-19 pandemic in HCW.

methodsOur sample comprised 4324 HCW of four professions (physicians, nurses, medical technical assistants (MTA) and pastoral workers) who completed an online survey from 20 April to 5 July 2020. Health-promoting resources were assessed using the Sense of Coherence Scale Short Form (SOC-3), the ENRICHD Social Support Inventory (ESSI) and one item on religiosity derived from the Scale of Transpersonal Trust (TPV). Anxiety and depression symptoms were measured with the PHQ-2 and GAD-2. The increase of subjective burden due to the pandemic was assessed as the retrospective difference between burden during the pandemic and before the pandemic.

resultsIn multiple regressions, higher SOC was strongly associated with fewer anxiety and depression symptoms. Higher social support was also related to less severe mental symptoms, but with a smaller effect size, while religiosity showed minimal to no correlation with anxiety or depression. In professional group analysis, SOC was negatively associated with mental symptoms in all groups, while social support only correlated significantly with mental health outcomes in physicians and MTA. In the total sample and among subgroups, an increase of subjective burden was meaningfully associated only with a weaker SOC.

conclusionPerceived social support and especially higher SOC appeared to be beneficial for mental health of HCW during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the different importance of the resources in the respective occupations requires further research to identify possible reasons.

Indexed as

PandemicsSense of CoherenceSocial SupportAdolescentAdultAnxietyCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleGermanyHealth PersonnelHealth PromotionHumansLogistic ModelsMale

Identifiers

PMID34310616
PMCPMC8312980
OpenAlexW3183171028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.