Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34310593›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

A mechanistic and data-driven reconstruction of the time-varying reproduction number: Application to the COVID-19 epidemic.

Bernard Cazelles, Clara Champagne, Benjamin Nguyen-Van-Yen, Catherine Comiskey, Elisabeta Vergu, Benjamin Roche

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bernard CazellesSorbonne Université, UMMISCO, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7972-361X
Clara ChampagneSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Benjamin Nguyen-Van-YenEco-Evolution Mathématique, IBENS, UMR 8197, CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0789-273X
Catherine ComiskeySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3528-777X
Elisabeta VerguINRAE, Université Paris-Saclay, MaIAGE, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Benjamin RocheMIVEGEC, IRD, CNRS and Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7975-4232

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effective reproduction number Reff is a critical epidemiological parameter that characterizes the transmissibility of a pathogen. However, this parameter is difficult to estimate in the presence of silent transmission and/or significant temporal variation in case reporting. This variation can occur due to the lack of timely or appropriate testing, public health interventions and/or changes in human behavior during an epidemic. This is exactly the situation we are confronted with during this COVID-19 pandemic. In this work, we propose to estimate Reff for the SARS-CoV-2 (the etiological agent of the COVID-19), based on a model of its propagation considering a time-varying transmission rate. This rate is modeled by a Brownian diffusion process embedded in a stochastic model. The model is then fitted by Bayesian inference (particle Markov Chain Monte Carlo method) using multiple well-documented hospital datasets from several regions in France and in Ireland. This mechanistic modeling framework enables us to reconstruct the temporal evolution of the transmission rate of the COVID-19 based only on the available data. Except for the specific model structure, it is non-specifically assumed that the transmission rate follows a basic stochastic process constrained by the observations. This approach allows us to follow both the course of the COVID-19 epidemic and the temporal evolution of its Reff(t). Besides, it allows to assess and to interpret the evolution of transmission with respect to the mitigation strategies implemented to control the epidemic waves in France and in Ireland. We can thus estimate a reduction of more than 80% for the first wave in all the studied regions but a smaller reduction for the second wave when the epidemic was less active, around 45% in France but just 20% in Ireland. For the third wave in Ireland the reduction was again significant (>70%).

Indexed as

Basic Reproduction NumberPandemicsSARS-CoV-2AlgorithmsBayes TheoremComputational BiologyCOVID-19EpidemicsFranceHumansIrelandMarkov ChainsModels, StatisticalMonte Carlo MethodSeroepidemiologic StudiesStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID34310593
PMCPMC8341713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.