Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34310203›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2022

The Subjective Experience of Word-Finding Difficulties in People With Aphasia: A Thematic Analysis of Interview Data.

Mackenzie E Fama, Erin Lemonds, Galya Levinson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mackenzie E FamaDepartment of Speech, Language & Hearing Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC.ORCID 0000-0001-8549-7623
Erin LemondsDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology, Towson University, MD.
Galya LevinsonDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology, Towson University, MD.
Towson University · USGeorge Washington University · US

Funding

Investigating insight into inner speech in aphasiaR03DC014310 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI TURKELTAUB, PETER ETHAN · 2015 to 2017
$462k
Using self-reported inner speech to guide treatment for anomiaF31DC014875 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI FAMA, MACKENZIE ELIZABETH · 2015 to 2017
$93k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC014875NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC014310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnomia, or difficulty with naming and word finding, is a pervasive deficit among individuals with aphasia. There is an extensive literature on the mechanisms underlying anomia and on approaches to treatment, but very little is known about the subjective experience of anomia during day-to-day life.

methodAs part of a larger testing battery, 53 adults with poststroke aphasia took part in a novel, structured interview that included an open-ended question about the general experience of anomia: "Do you ever know what you want to say, but you can't say it out loud? Please describe that feeling." Video-recorded interview responses were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis, an iterative, data-driven process that categorizes interview data into common themes.

resultsFive main themes emerged among the data from 37 participants who produced adequate responses for use in thematic analysis: strategies to cope with or compensate for anomia, comments on awareness of the level of breakdown (e.g., "I have an idea, but can't get the right words"), negative emotions, impact on relationships, and changes in frequency over time.

conclusionsParticipants showed strong awareness of anomia and its implications, demonstrating an ability to describe their language breakdown, identify relevant strategies to compensate and/or cope, and acknowledge the impact of anomia on their emotions and social interactions. This patient perspective may serve as a valuable supplement to information typically gained via objective language assessments. Clinicians and researchers may wish to consider incorporating similar subjective measures during assessment and treatment planning. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.15032643.

Indexed as

AphasiaAdultAnomiaHumansLanguageLanguage Therapy

Identifiers

PMID34310203
PMCPMC9135016
OpenAlexW3186084572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.