Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34310186›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of audiology2021

Clinical Importance of Binaural Information: Extending Auditory Assessment in Clinical Populations Using a Portable Testing Platform.

Anna C Diedesch, S J Adelaide Bock, Frederick J Gallun

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of audiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Feasibility and Repeatability of an Abbreviated Auditory Perceptual and Cognitive Test Battery.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Simplified cochlear frequency selectivity measure for sensorineural hearing loss screening: comparison with digit triplet test (DTT) and shortened speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) questionnaire.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna C DiedeschDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Western Washington University, Bellingham.
S J Adelaide BockCommunication Sciences & Disorders, Wendell Johnson Speech and Hearing Center, The University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Frederick J GallunDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.ORCID 0000-0002-4145-2199
Google (United States) · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Efficient diagnostic tools to evaluate central auditory dysfunctionR01DC015051 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI EDDINS, DAVID A., GALLUN, FREDERICK J. · 2016 to 2020
$2.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to use variability on tests of basic auditory processing to allow identification of those tests that could be used clinically to describe functional hearing ability beyond the pure-tone audiogram and clinical speech-in-noise tests. Method Psychoacoustic tests implemented using the Portable Automated Rapid Testing system on a calibrated iPad were evaluated for nine young normal-hearing participants (

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionAdultAgedAudiometry, Pure-ToneAuditory PerceptionAuditory ThresholdHearingHumansMiddle AgedNoiseYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34310186
PMCPMC8642088
OpenAlexW3186668506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.