Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34310109›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2021

Environmental Health Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: A Visual Overview and a Renewed Call for Coordination.

Rachel M Shaffer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparative review of human health reference values of the United States.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Review
  3. Six principles of exposure science: inspiring solutions that foster healthy environments.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rachel M ShafferDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, 3980 15th Avenue, Seattle, 98195, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2917-7865

Funding

Neurobehavior, Neuropathology, and Risk Factors in Alzheimer's DiseaseT32AG052354 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Brian C. Kraemer, ELAINE R. PESKIND · 2016 to 2026
$6.7M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG052354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the United States (U.S.), chemical evaluations and assessments are conducted by seven federal agencies responding to distinct statutory requirements and focusing on different exposure scenarios. While risk assessment is a fundamental concept in public health practice and policy, there is no clear, central, and concise summary of these processes. The novel infographic presented here depicts more than 30 different evaluation and assessment processes conducted by federal agencies for chemicals found in the environment, workplace, consumer products, hazardous waste sites, food, and/or cosmetics. The majority of these assessments are statutorily required. Most serve as sources of authoritative information to provide public health guidance or recommendations. Less than half directly result in risk management actions or regulations. Understanding these roles and processes can facilitate engagement from the broader community, including by highlighting priority areas for research to inform public health policy. This infographic also illustrates the opportunity and need for further intra- and interagency collaboration and coordination - including a particular focus on aggregate risk assessment, given that the population regularly experiences exposures from multiple sources crossing agency domains.

Indexed as

Public HealthRisk ManagementEnvironmental HealthFederal GovernmentRisk AssessmentUnited StatesWorkplaceaggregate riskenvironmental healthfederal policyhazard identificationrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID34310109
PMCPMC8530530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.