Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34310022›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2021

Modelling of gene loss propensity in the pangenomes of three Brassica species suggests different mechanisms between polyploids and diploids.

Philipp E Bayer, Armin Scheben, Agnieszka A Golicz, Yuxuan Yuan, Sebastien Faure, HueyTyng Lee, Harmeet Singh Chawla, Robyn Anderson, Ian Bancroft, Harsh Raman and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
14.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Horticulture research · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Origin, Evolution, and Diversification of the Expansin Family in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 15 institutions in 9 countries.

Philipp E BayerSchool of Biological Sciences and the Institute of Agriculture, Faculty of Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8530-3067
Armin SchebenSchool of Biological Sciences and the Institute of Agriculture, Faculty of Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2230-2013
Agnieszka A GoliczPlant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Yuxuan YuanSchool of Biological Sciences and the Institute of Agriculture, Faculty of Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0741-4196
Sebastien FaureInnolea SAS, Mondonville, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1094-3999
HueyTyng LeeDepartment of Plant Breeding, IFZ Research Centre for Biosystems, Land Use and Nutrition, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8561-3161
Harmeet Singh ChawlaDepartment of Plant Breeding, IFZ Research Centre for Biosystems, Land Use and Nutrition, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Robyn AndersonSchool of Biological Sciences and the Institute of Agriculture, Faculty of Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4872-3932
Ian BancroftDepartment of Biology, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7707-1171
Harsh RamanNSW Department of Primary Industries, Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, PMB, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9761-1518
Yong Pyo LimDepartment of Horticulture, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea.
Steven RobbensBASF Innovation Center, Gent, Belgium.
Lixi JiangInstitute of crop science, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8579-0763
Shengyi LiuChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Oil Crops Research Institute, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4955-4763
Michael S BarkerDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
M Eric SchranzBiosystematics Group, Wageningen University and Research Center, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6777-6565
Xiaowu WangInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (IVF, CAAS), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6753-227X
Graham J KingSouthern Cross Plant Science, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5975-6051
J Chris PiresDivision of Biological Sciences, Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9682-2639
Boulos ChalhoubInstitute of crop science, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Rod J SnowdonDepartment of Plant Breeding, IFZ Research Centre for Biosystems, Land Use and Nutrition, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5577-7616
Jacqueline BatleySchool of Biological Sciences and the Institute of Agriculture, Faculty of Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5391-5824
David EdwardsSchool of Biological Sciences and the Institute of Agriculture, Faculty of Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7599-6760
The University of Western Australia · AUJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEZheJiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNAZ Sint-Lucas · BEChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNChungnam National University · KRInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers · CNInstitut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale · FRSouthern Cross University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Missouri · USUniversity of York · GBWageningen University & Research · NLWagga Wagga Base Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant genomes demonstrate significant presence/absence variation (PAV) within a species; however, the factors that lead to this variation have not been studied systematically in Brassica across diploids and polyploids. Here, we developed pangenomes of polyploid Brassica napus and its two diploid progenitor genomes B. rapa and B. oleracea to infer how PAV may differ between diploids and polyploids. Modelling of gene loss suggests that loss propensity is primarily associated with transposable elements in the diploids while in B. napus, gene loss propensity is associated with homoeologous recombination. We use these results to gain insights into the different causes of gene loss, both in diploids and following polyploidization, and pave the way for the application of machine learning methods to understanding the underlying biological and physical causes of gene presence/absence.

Indexed as

BrassicaBrassica napusDiploidyGenome, PlantPolyploidyBrassicagene loss propensitymachine learningpangenometransposable elementsXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID34310022
PMCPMC8633514
OpenAlexW3183442947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.