Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34309909›Full record

ArticleProteins2022

Benchmarking of structure refinement methods for protein complex models.

Jacob Verburgt, Daisuke Kihara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacob VerburgtDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Daisuke KiharaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4091-6614

Funding

Purdue University Molecular Biophysics Training ProgramT32GM132024 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI Angeline Marie Lyon, John Tesmer · 2019 to 2026
$2.0M
Building protein structure models for intermediate resolution cryo-electron microscopy mapsR01GM133840 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI KIHARA, DAISUKE · 2020 to 2023
$1.6M
Structural Modeling of Multifarious Protein ComplexesR01GM123055 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI KIHARA, DAISUKE · 2017 to 2020
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123055NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM133840NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM132024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein structure docking is the process in which the quaternary structure of a protein complex is predicted from individual tertiary structures of the protein subunits. Protein docking is typically performed in two main steps. The subunits are first docked while keeping them rigid to form the complex, which is then followed by structure refinement. Structure refinement is crucial for a practical use of computational protein docking models, as it is aimed for correcting conformations of interacting residues and atoms at the interface. Here, we benchmarked the performance of eight existing protein structure refinement methods in refinement of protein complex models. We show that the fraction of native contacts between subunits is by far the most straightforward metric to improve. However, backbone dependent metrics, based on the Root Mean Square Deviation proved more difficult to improve via refinement.

Indexed as

Protein ConformationAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinMolecular Docking SimulationProteinsProteinsCAPRIprotein complexesprotein dockingprotein-protein interactionprotein structure refinement

Identifiers

PMID34309909
PMCPMC8671191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.