Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34309774›Full record

ArticleNeurochemical research2021

Investigation on the Anticonvulsant Potential of Luteolin and Micronized Luteolin in Adult Zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Cristiane Garbinato, Cássia Alves Lima-Rezende, Sabrina Ester Schneider, Jefferson Pedroso, Aline E Dos Santos, Fernanda Petry, Gean Pablo S Aguiar, Liz Girardi Müller, Marcelo Lanza, Angelo Piato and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurochemical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Supercritical COPharmaceutics · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Therapeutic Expedition of Luteolin against Brain-related Disorders: An Updated Review.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Cristiane GarbinatoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó, Chapecó, SC, Brazil.
Cássia Alves Lima-RezendePrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó, Chapecó, SC, Brazil.
Sabrina Ester SchneiderCurso de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó, Chapecó, SC, Brazil.
Jefferson PedrosoCurso de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó, Chapecó, SC, Brazil.
Aline E Dos SantosDepartamento de Engenharia Química e de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Fernanda PetryPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó, Chapecó, SC, Brazil.
Gean Pablo S AguiarPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó, Chapecó, SC, Brazil.
Liz Girardi MüllerPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó, Chapecó, SC, Brazil.
Marcelo LanzaDepartamento de Engenharia Química e de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Angelo PiatoDepartamento de Farmacologia, Instituto de Ciências Básicas da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
J Vladimir OliveiraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó, Chapecó, SC, Brazil.
Anna Maria SiebelPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó, Chapecó, SC, Brazil. anna.siebel@unochapeco.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7896-1456
Community University of Chapecó Region - Unochapecó · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epilepsy affects around 50 million people worldwide, and an important number of patients (30%) fail to respond to any available antiepileptic drug. Previous studies have shown that luteolin presents a promising potential as an anticonvulsant. On the other hand, different studies showed that luteolin does not promote anticonvulsant effects. Therefore, there is a lack of consensus about the use of luteolin for seizure control. Luteolin low bioavailability could be a limiting factor to obtain better results. Attractively, micronization technology has been applied to improve flavonoids bioavailability. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of luteolin on its raw form and micronized luteolin in a PTZ-induced seizure model in adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). Our results demonstrate that luteolin and micronized luteolin did not block PTZ-induced seizures in adult zebrafish. Also, luteolin and micronized luteolin did not provoke behavioral changes. Finally, our results show that 24 h after seizure occurrence, no changes were detected for p70S6Kb, interleukin 1β, and caspase-3 transcript levels. Altogether, we failed to observe an anticonvulsant potential of luteolin in adult zebrafish, even in its micronized form. However, we recommend new studies to investigate luteolin benefits in epilepsy.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnimalsAnticonvulsantsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleLuteolinMaleParticle SizePentylenetetrazoleSeizuresZebrafishAnticonvulsantsLuteolinPentylenetetrazoleEpilepsyLuteolinMicronizationSeizureZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID34309774
OpenAlexW3185942458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.