Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34309763›Full record

SynthesisJournal of occupational rehabilitation2022

What are the Predictors of Return to Work for People With Elbow, Wrist, and Hand Conditions? A Systematic Review.

Kayla Bousfield, Ju-Young Cheon, Sarah Harley, Amber Lampiris-Tremba, Justin Loseby, Nancy Bianchi, Andrew Barnes, Reuben Escorpizo

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kayla BousfieldDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, The University of Vermont, 106 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT, 05452, USA.
Ju-Young CheonDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, The University of Vermont, 106 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT, 05452, USA.
Sarah HarleyDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, The University of Vermont, 106 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT, 05452, USA.
Amber Lampiris-TrembaDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, The University of Vermont, 106 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT, 05452, USA.
Justin LosebyDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, The University of Vermont, 106 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT, 05452, USA.
Nancy BianchiDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, The University of Vermont, 106 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT, 05452, USA.
Andrew BarnesDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, The University of Vermont, 106 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT, 05452, USA.
Reuben EscorpizoDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, The University of Vermont, 106 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT, 05452, USA. Reuben.escorpizo@med.uvm.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Conditions affecting the elbow, forearm, wrist, and hand can cause debilitating pain and loss of function in the working population. While there is knowledge about intervention options for this region of the body, there is limited research on systematically identifying the predictors of return to work in this population. Methods A systematic literature review identified all English-language studies that assess predictors of return to work for people with elbow, wrist, and hand conditions from 2009 to 2021 using PRISMA guidelines. Studies that examined exclusively shoulder injuries, randomized control trials, non-human studies, case studies, case reports, case series, and narrative reviews were excluded. Participants of included studies must have a health-related condition of the fingers, wrist, forearm, and elbow that is preventing work participation and must be 16 years and older. Included studies must be observational, longitudinal, and include a return to work outcome. Results Nineteen out of 170 studies were included. Average time away from work varied between seven to 304 days. Positive predictors of early return to work include: demographics, type of injury, type of treatment, work status, physical factors, psychological factors, use of self-reported outcome measures, and self-reported pain. Conclusion Five clinician recommendations were developed based on the findings of our systematic review. Clinicians should consider the type of work, use of outcome measures, psychological factors, hospitalization, and salary. These recommendations are intended to influence the behavior of clinicians when determining prognosis for return to work of people with elbow, wrist, and hand conditions.

Indexed as

ElbowWristHumansPainReturn to WorkUpper ExtremityEmploymentOutcome measuresPredictorsPrognostic factorsReturn to workUpper extremity conditionsVocational rehabilitationWork rehabilitation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.