Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34309695›Full record

ReviewInternational orthopaedics2021

Displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures: state of the art for athletes and young active people.

Dominique Saragaglia, Ramsay Refaie

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Efficacy of intramedullary bridge fixation for midshaft clavicle fractures: a retrospective analysis of a novel technique.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dominique SaragagliaCHU Grenoble-Alpes-Voiron, Route Des Gorges, 38500, Voiron, France. dsaragaglia@yahoo.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-1135-7075
Ramsay RefaieDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, South Tees NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.
Boiron (France) · FRSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFractures ofthe clavicle are frequent injuries (between 4 and 10% of adult fractures) and mid-shaft diaphyseal fractures represent more than 80% of clavicle fractures. In a recent study from the USA in 2019, an incidence of 22.4 fractures per year per 100,000 people was reported. Multiple injury mechanisms are recognised, with sport accounting for 50 to 85% of these injuries. There is little or no consensus as to the optimal treatment but in recent years multiple studies have suggested operative management should be favoured in athletes and young active patients.

objectivesThese are (1) to present the anatomy and the anatomical-pathology of the fractures of the clavicle as well as the mechanisms of injury, (2), (3) to describe non-operative and operative treatment methods, (4) to review the literature around different treatment modalities and (5) to attempt to describe the best treatment for athletes.

methodsTo collect and analyse the most recent articles of the literature regarding the management of displaced mid-shaft fractures of the clavicle for athletes and young active people.

resultsLooking at studies of the general population, the results tend to favour surgical treatment with a smaller incidence of non-union and faster return to function. These results are mirrored in the athlete population where several studies have shown excellent anatomic restoration and functional recovery after plate fixation.

conclusionBased on this analysis, with the exception of patients who refuse operative management after an informed discussion, the treatment of choice in displaced clavicle fractures in athletes seems to be operative treatment with a plate and screws. However, prospective randomised studies comparing non-surgical treatment and plate osteosynthesis are missing and it is not possible to state that the latter is the best treatment.

Indexed as

ClavicleFractures, BoneAdultAthletesBone PlatesFracture Fixation, InternalHumansProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeClavicleFractureNon-operative treatmentReturn to sportSurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID34309695
OpenAlexW3184369847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.